Although the law of war is commonly understood as applying to the conduct of hostilities and the protection of war victims, the law of war addresses other situations as well.
The law of war establishes:
• rules governing the resort to force (jus ad bellum);
• rules between enemies for the conduct of hostilities and the protection of war victims in international and non-international armed conflict;
• rules between belligerents and neutrals;
• rules for military occupation;
• duties during peacetime that help implement the above rules.
In addition, these rules in the law of war can sometimes be applied by analogy to other contexts.
302 Refer to § 18.3.1.1 (Implementation of International Obligations by Persons With the Authority to Make the Necessary Decisions and Judgments Required by International Law).
Page 302
Some measures to ensure adherence to this obligation may include training members of the armed forces and persons authorized to accompany the armed forces on the protection of cultural property in general (and the prohibition of theft, pillage, or vandalism in particular) as part of general procedures for the dissemination and implementation of the law of war.
Other measures may include:
(1) issuing and enforcing orders to the same effect;
(2) investigating alleged or suspected offenses and taking disciplinary or punitive action, as appropriate under U.S. law
(3) taking measures to facilitate the recovery and return of stolen or
misappropriated cultural property.
Although it may not always be feasible to prevent or stop theft, pillage, or
misappropriation of, or acts of vandalism against, cultural property, efforts to identify cultural property within an area of operations and to secure it from theft or pillage are a prudent part of the planning process of military operations. For example, such efforts may deny opposing forces the opportunity to exploit harm to cultural property for propaganda purposes.
Other examples to strengthen the above examples; the possibility and probability of Chapter/ Footnote / and Page correlations with comms from Q.
Q makes many Law of War Manual references but apparently few anons (if any) pick up on this for over a year.
Q and Trump would also mention Xi (Meaning President of China)
But XI is also Chapter XI – Military Occupation in Law of War Manual.
Q mentioned Chinese auto manufacturing in post 1118
Law of War Manual 11.18 is Enemy Property During Occupation
Q posts 1116, 1117, 1120 mention the word China and XI
Law of War Manual has 11.16 and 11.17 and 11.20 (Military Occupation)
Q post 1123 has picture of Trump with his Military Generals.
Law of War manual 11.23 is OTHER ECONOMIC REGULATION OF OCCUPIED TERRITORY
Q posts #691 in Feb, 2018 (years before Covid):
CHINA did this for/with us
Law of War Manual 6.9.1 is Biological Weapons – Prohibition on Use as a Method of Warfare
Again, two years before Covid hits, Q makes a post mentioning China intentionally doing something. Post # points to prohibited biological weapons.
Q post 764 in Feb, 2018 says: You are missing the connections.
Page 764 in Law of War Manual is Standard for Determining When Territory Is Considered Occupied.
Q post 1800: This is not a game
Law of War Manual XVIII – Implementation and Enforcement of the Law of War
Q post 1802: Something BIG is about to drop
18.2 PRUDENTIAL REASONS SUPPORTING THE IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW OF WAR
Q post 1803: How do you safeguard the integrity of our elections from domestic & foreign criminal actors?
Law of War Manual 18.3 DUTIES OF INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES
Q post 1806: Full attack mode
18.6 DISSEMINATION, STUDY, AND OTHER MEASURES TO FACILITATE UNDERSTANDING OF DUTIES UNDER THE LAW OF WAR
18.20 PROSECUTION IN INTERNATIONAL AND HYBRID COURTS
Q post 1820: confirmed
18.19 DISCIPLINE IN NATIONAL JURISDICTIONS OF INDIVIDUALS FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW OF WAR
Q post 1819: Trip update [confirmation]
18.22 PRINCIPLES OF INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CRIMES UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW
Q post 1822:
Define Conspiracy.
a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful
“a conspiracy to destroy the government"
the action of plotting or conspiring.
"they were cleared of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice"
This movement is not about one person or a group of people.
They cannot contain or defeat what they do not understand
Is any of this normal?
Think sealed indictments count.
Think resignations of CEOs.
Think resignations of Senators.
Think resignations of Congress.
18.9 STATES’ OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW OF WAR
Q post 1809: Q posts a breakdown of all sealed indictments by state.
The 2015 DoD Law of War Manual released a few days before Trump announced his run for President.
Both the Law of War Manual and Q begin their introduction with a discussion of General Washington and how Lincoln waged the Civil War.
3.2 SITUATIONS TO WHICH THE LAW OF WAR APPLIES
Although the law of war is commonly understood as applying to the conduct of hostilities and the protection of war victims, the law of war addresses other situations as well.
The law of war establishes:
• rules governing the resort to force (jus ad bellum);
• rules between enemies for the conduct of hostilities and the protection of war victims in international and non-international armed conflict;
• rules between belligerents and neutrals;
• rules for military occupation;
• duties during peacetime that help implement the above rules.
In addition, these rules in the law of war can sometimes be applied by analogy to other contexts.
302 Refer to § 18.3.1.1 (Implementation of International Obligations by Persons With the Authority to Make the Necessary Decisions and Judgments Required by International Law).
Page 302
Some measures to ensure adherence to this obligation may include training members of the armed forces and persons authorized to accompany the armed forces on the protection of cultural property in general (and the prohibition of theft, pillage, or vandalism in particular) as part of general procedures for the dissemination and implementation of the law of war.
Other measures may include: (1) issuing and enforcing orders to the same effect;
(2) investigating alleged or suspected offenses and taking disciplinary or punitive action, as appropriate under U.S. law
(3) taking measures to facilitate the recovery and return of stolen or misappropriated cultural property.
Although it may not always be feasible to prevent or stop theft, pillage, or misappropriation of, or acts of vandalism against, cultural property, efforts to identify cultural property within an area of operations and to secure it from theft or pillage are a prudent part of the planning process of military operations. For example, such efforts may deny opposing forces the opportunity to exploit harm to cultural property for propaganda purposes.
Other examples to strengthen the above examples; the possibility and probability of Chapter/ Footnote / and Page correlations with comms from Q.
Q makes many Law of War Manual references but apparently few anons (if any) pick up on this for over a year.
Q and Trump would also mention Xi (Meaning President of China)
But XI is also Chapter XI – Military Occupation in Law of War Manual.
Q mentioned Chinese auto manufacturing in post 1118
Law of War Manual 11.18 is Enemy Property During Occupation
Q posts 1116, 1117, 1120 mention the word China and XI
Law of War Manual has 11.16 and 11.17 and 11.20 (Military Occupation)
Q post 1123 has picture of Trump with his Military Generals.
Law of War manual 11.23 is OTHER ECONOMIC REGULATION OF OCCUPIED TERRITORY
Q posts #691 in Feb, 2018 (years before Covid): CHINA did this for/with us
Law of War Manual 6.9.1 is Biological Weapons – Prohibition on Use as a Method of Warfare
Again, two years before Covid hits, Q makes a post mentioning China intentionally doing something. Post # points to prohibited biological weapons.
Q post 764 in Feb, 2018 says: You are missing the connections.
Page 764 in Law of War Manual is Standard for Determining When Territory Is Considered Occupied.
Q post 1800: This is not a game
Law of War Manual XVIII – Implementation and Enforcement of the Law of War
Q post 1802: Something BIG is about to drop
18.2 PRUDENTIAL REASONS SUPPORTING THE IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE LAW OF WAR
Q post 1803: How do you safeguard the integrity of our elections from domestic & foreign criminal actors?
Law of War Manual 18.3 DUTIES OF INDIVIDUAL MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES
Q post 1806: Full attack mode
18.6 DISSEMINATION, STUDY, AND OTHER MEASURES TO FACILITATE UNDERSTANDING OF DUTIES UNDER THE LAW OF WAR
18.20 PROSECUTION IN INTERNATIONAL AND HYBRID COURTS
Q post 1820: confirmed
18.19 DISCIPLINE IN NATIONAL JURISDICTIONS OF INDIVIDUALS FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW OF WAR
Q post 1819: Trip update [confirmation]
18.22 PRINCIPLES OF INDIVIDUAL CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CRIMES UNDER INTERNATIONAL LAW
Q post 1822:
Define Conspiracy.
a secret plan by a group to do something unlawful or harmful “a conspiracy to destroy the government"
the action of plotting or conspiring. "they were cleared of conspiracy to pervert the course of justice"
This movement is not about one person or a group of people.
They cannot contain or defeat what they do not understand
Is any of this normal?
Think sealed indictments count.
Think resignations of CEOs.
Think resignations of Senators.
Think resignations of Congress.
18.9 STATES’ OBLIGATIONS WITH RESPECT TO VIOLATIONS OF THE LAW OF WAR
Q post 1809: Q posts a breakdown of all sealed indictments by state.
The 2015 DoD Law of War Manual released a few days before Trump announced his run for President.
Both the Law of War Manual and Q begin their introduction with a discussion of General Washington and how Lincoln waged the Civil War.