This is absurd. A fire like this would cause some spalling and a possible loss of compressive strength, but because of the nature of concrete, a fire like this would never reach the steel reinforcement causing collapse in this fashion and this quickly. As per the pedo death cult playbook, one can only assume there was other factors involved.
Is it? Perhaps, but there are many factors that need to be considered such as the amount of heat, what burned (gas, diesel etc) has various degrees of temperature output. How long did this burn? The winds are a factor. At this time we don’t know the facts, if we are ever told. My question is: why the hell would a tanker stop under the overpass to burn? Common sense would be to pull over as far away from other structures as possible or did the driver just flee at a very bad moment?
How does a smoky blaze collapse a bridge? Unless there was an explosion....
Like the fire under the Interstate bridge in Atlanta several years ago. It cooks the aggregate and moisture out of the concrete and down it goes.
This is absurd. A fire like this would cause some spalling and a possible loss of compressive strength, but because of the nature of concrete, a fire like this would never reach the steel reinforcement causing collapse in this fashion and this quickly. As per the pedo death cult playbook, one can only assume there was other factors involved.
Is it? Perhaps, but there are many factors that need to be considered such as the amount of heat, what burned (gas, diesel etc) has various degrees of temperature output. How long did this burn? The winds are a factor. At this time we don’t know the facts, if we are ever told. My question is: why the hell would a tanker stop under the overpass to burn? Common sense would be to pull over as far away from other structures as possible or did the driver just flee at a very bad moment?
I suppose so.
My thoughts exactly. The steel wouldn't weaken as per our education on 9/11 with aircraft fuel.