Thank you for the interesting reply fren. I cannot help but correlate your your thoughts on the 1871 treaty and WTO to what I am learning of the legal meaning of a citizen of the USA (Corp). According to Anna Von Reitz the unincorporated part of the usa that controlled the most of the commerce (The South) was destroyed and done away with creating a vacuum. (My memory may be deceiving me as I have only been exposed to what she explained once. I will have to revisit to make sure I fully understand) This vacuum of commercial control was usurped by the crown and the reason we were all indebted to the corporation. It is what stands between us and our unalienable rights Given by God through the constitution. The way to reclaim them is by rejecting citizenship of the USA (Corp) and claiming state national status as this will remove the Corp’s jurisdiction over you. It makes sense to me that the WTO has or would be modeled the same way to enslave the world.

I may be slightly confused about some of what I’ve mentioned, it’s been a firehose of knowledge in the last couple months and I may not have it all fully understood, but this is how it is making sense to me so far. I’m sure my understanding will tighten up over the coming weeks. Thank you, however unknowingly, for making a connection for me.

Anna Von Reitz Granna’s bites video series… https://youtu.be/cGFb0JC1uwk

To learn more about state national status I recommend this crazy guy. His delivery is a bit immature and irreverent but he cites all his statements by the USC, UCC, and Black’s Law 4th edition. He knows his stuff and the quickest easiest way to kill the contracts you have unknowingly made with the USA (Corp). I suggest signing up for his free course. It is HIGHLY enlightening. https://onestupidfuck.com/