There is a lot of speculation about the phrase: the seal is broken.
I am going to pose another view.
First he said this a couple of times, I think 3x. The seal is broken.
Context:
Trump was talking about the deplorable state of the USA. No significant borders = no country. De system of law is out of order = no authority, money= no indication of sovereingty. Infiltration at the highest levels by bribes = no functioning administration. By indicting Trump under the espionage act, these dwellers in Washington DC, Trump called it China Town, it becomes not only foreign but in a state of enimity.
Now take a look at the flags.
Before his indictment Trump would speak with flags behind him, with golden presidential emblems adorned flagpoles and a flag adorned with a yellow fringe.
Also take note of the video Trump retruthed where is travels the world. Note the color of the emblems. All silver colored. Sometimes a ball, or a spear.
In his Bedminster address you'll notice the color of the eagle: not Gold but Silver.
So now Trump says: the SEAL is broken.
Additional consideration:
https://mcgrathseals.ie/dispose-corporate-seal-free-destroying-recycling-service/
Hypothesis:
I view it as meaning: The Great Seal has been broken.
By changing the presidential eagle from gold to silver, I think he changed the venue.
Gold, traditionally connected to the money of Monarchs, and Silver, the money of the People, I think he is signalling that his promise at inauguration of January 2017 to revert power back to the people, is going to be manifested in a different venue.
By the same token that brought the USA into a corporatocratic-postal construct, so, I think, he has just moved into a different construct.
If this is difficult to comprehend, just research postal venue since July first 1775. What did it setup? What did the Constution replace and setup? What did the Constitution of 1871 set up? What did the yellow fringe since 2000 signify? What is the correct flag for contracting?
Happy digging!
One addition:
Trump is the owner of the original seal!
And it may explain why Dan Scavino JR posted the flag in darkness.
Given Q's messaging of the Title 4 flag, It would not surprise me if the venue change has been setup years ago, to be activated at a moment's notice, to prevent the hassle with the maritime proscription law of 1 year and 1 day.
It reminds me of POTC, where the son of Mr Turner is arguing with Ms Smith, who turns out to be ms Barbosa: occult vs science. And when you go deep enough physics becomes metaphysics.
However, even your writing betrays the fundamental obviousness in your statement: your usage of symbols, strung together to form words, to convey your opinion.
So, yes, I wholeheartedly agree: it is as bad.
On a different note, given your background, you are aware of the use of symbols, and some of the meaning behind it.
If there is reluctance to go deeper than that, I can sympathize. It is not for everyone.
It is the exegesis of a Rorshcach blot, or the divination of magical spells. I'm more attuned to Rupert Sheldrake, who scientifically probes the truly unknown.
Interesting comment.
It seems you do concede there are unknowns that one can try and probe into, yes?
My statement is:
What else is what we do in this thread other than probing something unknown, hidden in plain sight, occult by the lack of knowledge?
Looking at your post from this angle, it appears you have strong convictions on what is allowed to be discussed and what is not.
For instance, has it escaped your attention that when Q writes: think mirror, it can mean speculation? Or that what you label: divination of magic spells is not at all divination but rather dis-spelling?
The word you so colorfully used is: scientifically. You are in for a sur-prise. So, how does that system go?
It starts with .... observation, by looking intently. Then the structural description of that phenomena. Then suppositions, ideas to make tests. Perhaps finding additional information to support the direction of inquiry.
It is a process of building till the point of tests rendering the same results.
What else than this are we doing here.
Pissing with heavy opinions without proof, such pissing can be dismissed without proof .... yet, I thought it better to pay you the courtesy of discussion.
But besides altering your stance somewhat in terms of making allowance, if that is a bridge to far, you can always decide to ignore these kind of threads. The choice is yours. It all depends on your own consciousness.
In science, you observe objective phenomena. In this, one is using the events as a mirror of one's own fantasies. It is purely subjective. All this nonsense about fringed or non-fringed flags is about as meaningful as the difference between 3-leaf and 4-leaf clovers, or walking under a ladder. And that sort of confused thinking I do not ignore.
hahahaha, you are touched in the head! The one confused is you!
Poor man. Go, and enjoy your delusions of grandeur with your billion dollar governmental contract. Say goodbye to the clowns from us.