The clickbait Shi*te article from The People's Crap, Sorry, I mean The People's Voice is now doing the circles. Sadly, the penetration from this disinformation clickbait site run by an ultra liberal gay couple (targeting truth seekers and patriotic persons who have begun to wake up) is increasing, with more people spreading the rubbish.
(Check out the site to see just how fake this rag is. https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/ Used to be NewsPunch, but they have rebranded just this past year because their reputation became so bad.)
The story at hand is that a whistleblower related to the Biden-Burisma connection has been found dead.
This is proven fake news.
Sadly, the crap from NewsPunch aka The People's Voice aka Your News Wire is now reaching more and more of the community and far too few people are practicing discernment. Even Hannity had this story posted until they found out it was super crap clickbait. InTheMatrixxx also retweeted the story, etc.
The standard pattern now used by NewsPunch is 1) ultra fake clickbait headline 2) followup one or two paragraphs of fabricated clickbait 3) underwrite with actual news that SEEMS to lend verisimilitude to the made up clickbait headlines.
A quick video by Sather on this story (Burisma whistleblower dead) - about how the truth was distorted for clickbait.
https://rumble.com/v2ugq3g-was-a-whistleblower-against-biden-found-dead.html?mref=nmtun&mrefc=3
FYI: for background on The People's Voice:
Know your Clickbait:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b6Rbli8W/know-your-clickbait-the-peoples-/
More from Sather on this:
This is what people are misinterpreting about the "Biden whistleblower found dead" clickbait going around
From Giuliani's interview with Newsmax - he said he gave the DOJ "a witness to was the wife of Burisma's former owner".
That former owner is Mykola Lissin, who died in 2011.
Giuliani did NOT say his witness died - parse his words.
But disinfo site "The People's Voice" are twisting his words into "Biden Whistleblower found dead!" - which is false - yet it's going viral now.
You see how easily things are misinterpreted and false narratives go viral?
https://t.me/jordansather/8896
Note: I'm only quoting Sather here because he pulls apart a LOT of clickbait disinfo stuff.
Opinion: As anons we search for and analyse truth. We also need to point out disinfo and fake clickbait lies which target our community when they happen.
That's what I said yesterday. It sounded fishy to me. The source was suspicious. I said the following about the source:
"It may be true, but I'll wait for verification from other sources.
This is from "The People’s Voice", which is a for-profit, independent news and entertainment website. It states they generate revenue via advertising. Decisions about what stories to cover are exclusively decided by our writers and editors."
I've made a few posts about TPV aka NewsPunch aka YNW.
See them for easy access to background on who they are.
Source suspicious? kek. That's like saying the JFK assassination may not have been done only by oswald alone.
You certainly have made a few posts on this. In addition, you posted about Michael Baxter of RealRawNews and provided good background information on this paid grifter.
On a few occasions I commented on the paid FBI provocateur/asset Hal Turner and mentioned Michael Baxter. As an example, on 06-29-22 I commented on this here. This is about the time I read your post regarding Michael Baxter and learned more.
I made a comment of seeing the TPV article yesterday. I'm not trying to rain on your parade though. I'm somewhat indebted to your fine research in this area as shown by the saved post above. When I started to read the article I saw, "The People's Voice", to me that source sounded suspicious and as a natural reaction, I didn't trust it. With you saying, "That's like saying the JFK assassination may not have been done only by oswald alone", this is non sequitur to me. Many of us have not done the deep dive in to these satire and faux-news as you have. We are grateful for your work though. However, it may not be as readily obvious as it is with you. I'm sure there's more out there. So, far I haven't fallen victim to any of them. I made note of that in my comment above.
Thank you Tew.
I was grappling for a suitable analogy, and actually under pressure at work during a brief break.
I think to some extent it does work, however, because to many people in the past and perhaps even now (?), it surely was NOT obvious that teh JFK murder was a conspiracy that involved CIA and a whole bunch of other unsavories. I think a lot of people simply accepted the official 'story'.
So it kind of corresponds. Not everyone is as familiar with the clickbait disinfo antics, or specific sites like RRR or the People's Crap, etc, as you point out, so saying it sounds suspicious makes sense.
I wanted to draw an analogy that didn't sound condescending or pompous (good luck with that, FI) and it wasn't intended to imply that everyone SHOULD know exactly how full of crap these places are. Although, from personal experience, I think it really only needs a moderately developed antenna to pick up on that. You're sense that the source seemed suspicious indicates your antenna is operational to a degree.
It should be noted that they way I learned about these places was that I myself "fell victim" to some of them in my early anoning days, and re-posted things, only to find out later what was what. Once I realized what was happening - getting activated by sensationalist headlines or information item and then triggered to share and repost before actually vetting the information properly - I began to adopt different practices and countered their influence in my info sphere by developing usable practices for spotting dodgy stuff and quickly vetting it.
Some of my reaction is partly a sense of frustration, at least with people I think are NOT newcomers and should be (in my opinion) more diligent in managing the information they share. I mean, I've seen a mod and several prolific posters (like in our top 10 or 20) post Newspunch stuff directly in the past several months. Geepers. If you're a newcomer, its understandable, but pedes with at least a few years under their belt? That irks me.
But I really value your response here. It's important to recognize that we all have different strengths, and that perhaps its unreasonable to expect others to spot the grimey stuff as quickly as (I think I do). But we all make mistakes too, and Perhaps there is a bit of room for me to reflect on exactly what attitudes I'm bringing to the board as far as the posting of this stuff is concerned.
If you have found my digs useful, that's a massive plus. I recall how on VOAT and other forums, not so much here now, people used to lash out if you asked for source or some actual research to go with what they post. They'd say "Don't be lazy. Do your own research."
My view was always that if one person invests an hour and then delivers the fruits of that work in a useful form, that can save hundreds, or thousands of human work hours that otherwise other pedes would have to do themselves.
I definitely encourage people to do their own research, but doing a bit extra or making the effort to smooth the way for others is another way of advancing the cause.
Actually, this afternoon I was just musing on the idea of encouraging others to actually go to Newspunch and dig and research. I think more of us actually need to investigate and familiarize ourselves with disinfo operations, because sun tzu, "know your enemy" I wonder how many pedes simply don't bother spending any time analysing or familiarizing themselves with the fake news distortion disinfo methodologies, and so that stuff just doesn't even occupy any of their attention.
IMO, it should, because (imo) we are most certainly under attack. All the time.
In any case, I expect to be reflecting on my attitudes and assumptions. Thank you very much for the useful (and honest) feedback.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12igctnBgq/michael-baxter--grifter-or-patri/
PS good memory
https://greatawakening.win/p/15IXu75fvy/russia-publishes-coordinates-of-/c/
based comment. I recall reading that. Don't know Hal Turner, tho it sounds like I should.
belated updoogle!