TLDR:
The People's' Voice = Newspunch = Clickbait (Disinfo) and an Attack on Truth in the current 5th Generational Warfare
If you examine ANY article on https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/, formerly known as Newspunch (Go to Newspunch.com, and it links directly to https://thepeoplesvoice.tv/)
Invariably, the Headline is clickbait bullsh*te, followed by two or 3 paragraphs of baseless, made-up assertions with no sauce, then followed by actual real content provided in order to somehow shore up the original disinformation headlines and primary assertions.
Case Study
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b6N5KqN1/barack-hussein-obama-has-urged-t/
Former President Barack Hussein Obama has urged the Biden regime to declare a national emergency and use its powers to eradicate all independent media online ahead of the 2024 election.
Speaking to CBS News on Tuesday, Obama warned that the mainstream media has lost its control over the narrative and said the only solution is for the U.S. government to step in and take drastic action.
A search for these actual statements delivers NO results or confirmable sauces.
However, Obama DID do an interview with the CBS interviewer, but what did he actually say?
https://news.yahoo.com/obama-concerned-americans-almost-occupy-184557585.html
No other sauce except for NEWPUNCH, and the usual regurgitating clickbait sites can be found for the sensationalist headline that Obama said anything like
We Need Full-Blown Gov’t Censorship To Eradicate Independent Media
It really should be clear to Even newbie anons what is happening here.
We all know Obama is a treasonous POS, quite evil, and that he would LOVE to have complete media censorship.
But that is why clickbait disinfo honcho Sean Adl-Tabatabai and his website publish these outrageous headlines. They are betting people just totally consume it without any discernment. Looking at this post on GAW, do you think he is right?
How many of our pedes just accept it because it is a headline that appeals directly to confirmation bias and is posted on GAW?
The impacts of spreading this clickbait are insidious.
Problem - Reaction - Solution
Step 1. Take some fact and mix with fake content. Create fake-ified bait.
1.a. Ensure that the facts pertain to that you wish to minimize or hide from public understanding
1.b. Maximize reaction factor by ensuring that the fake content is something that will trigger emotional engagement from those who understand truth on some level
Step 2. Promulgate said bait by targeting reactionary impulses in (people)
2.a. Establish and then utilize disinfo sites in the form of clickbait (aka dress the wolves in sheep's clothing)
Step 3. Use Hoax and Fact Checkers to discredit content on the basis of fake-ified details
3.a. The more you generate fake-ified news in order to muddy the waters and poison the information pool, the better
Step 4. Rinse and Repeat
Who is the People's Voice TV?
The People's Voice TV was previously the Video Arm of the CLICKBAIT site Newspunch. Same old Sean Adl-Tabatabai, same old Baxter Dmitry, same old clickbait.
Who is Newspunch?
Newspunch was first created as YourNewsWire.com
https://web.archive.org/web/20230000000000*/YourNewsWire.com
YourNewsWire.com rebranded itself as Newspunch.com in late 2018. Now, the Newspunch Website URL (click here: http://Newspunch.com) and links directly to The People's Voice. In appears, then, that YourNewsWire.com aka Newspunch is once again rebranding itself under another name: ThePeople'sVoice.tv.
YourNewsWire > NewsPunch > ThePeople'sVoice.tv
The same organization and content rebranded under different names were all founded by "Sean Adl-Tabatabai and his husband Sinclair Treadway" Sauce: Wikipedia, who were reportedly the first "married" gay duo in the United Kingdom Sauce: Daily Beast. YourNewsWire was described by (The Hollywood Reporter)[https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/hollywoods-hidden-alt-media-firebrands-1041157/] as the "Breitbart of the Left".
Q3038
Decide for yourself (be free from outside opinion). Decide for yourself (be objective in your conclusions). Decide for yourself (be true in your own beliefs). Decide for yourself (be open to following the facts). Decide for yourself (be strong in defending your beliefs). Decide for yourself (be resistant to blindly accepting fact-less statements).
Thank you, FractalizingIron. I have seen posts recently with "content" from old seanx's disinfo farm claiming he is a genuine researcher. Definitely something for everyone on the board to be aware of.
u/catsfive
u/bubble_bursts
Thank you mods always. Not sure who stickied and applied the flair, but I would like to point out that NewsPunch / The People's Voice are most certainly not MSM.
They fall clearly in the alt-media area, even though they are fake news.
Maybe we could get a Beware of Disinfo or a Clickbait/Disinfo flair?
Asking for a fren..... /s
As always, thank you mods.
Didn't you already do a post about this/ something similar? Maybe not on the board itself but in general chat? We spoke of this.
I've made up to three posts about this in the last few months, because for some reason, some of the most prolific posters to the board fall into posting completely fabricated information as if it were true, and far too many (imo) board members swallow it whole, without a second thought.
For a Q board, posting this stuff is the epitome of the opposite of Q, (IMO).
It’s funny cause your post is stickied right above an old mod’s post sourcing People’s voice, right about the same time
Hehe. Is that so?
I'm in a less frequented time zone, so I might have missed that.
It's worth knowing that in the view of some (all?) mods, a sticky is not necessarily an endorsement, but rather an "Eyes On". So sometimes something will be stickied to encourage the board to go into something and dissect it or blow it apart.
In the case of this post, I made it after deporting the The People's Voice post. A mod responded and explained his reasoning that because he considered the real content in the article valuable, her re-approved the post after initially removing it.
I think my post was stickied because it raised a different viewpoint, contrasting with that decision, and in many, many cases, the mods want to facilitate discussion of different viewpoints rather than promoting one particular view.
That's a policy I agree with, although personally, i think there should be zero tolerance for clear disinfo operations like NewsPunch/TPV.
Ps. Good reminder. Thank you!
It was in general chat, I remember now. Because I had never heard of half of the the names mentioned! I ways like your posts. Thank you fren.
Great post. Now do 'Natural News'.
Is that the Health Ranger? I have always found his headlines very clickbaity, although not quite as high on the BS scale as NP.
Correct. His podcast stays away from politics for the most. But the news website would have us believe such stories as 'Brennan was executed at Gitmo' without anything to back it up. It may be true, but just rumors passing as news.
Hey Roofie.
Yah, me too. I'm not going to jump the gun and pronounce them fake news, but like you, I've noticed highly sensationalized headlines that trigger powerful (and usually negative) emotional reactions.
If you know where that info is, I'd be keen to see it.
After a while, you can begin to see the common features (aka red flags) of how disinfo operations work. A lot of it might well be simply an unethical motivation for profit, but only a fool would ignore the reality that the DS and Cabal and other tentacles of the octopus have deliberate and orchestrated disinformation operations running all over the place.
I'm not saying Natural News is one of those - I don't have enough experience with them to make any such assertion, but if anyone is posting [Joe Bloggs was executed at Gitmo] it's a pretty sure sign that they are peddling bullsh*te.
Doom Ranger the blackpill dealer.
Seems like that a bit...
Thanks for posting this. Good research too. I'm convinced there is 3-letter agency funding to misinform the people. We all know it. I keep going back to the statement made by former CIA Director William Casey in 1981 and how powerful that statement really was. He said it for a reason. People should not take this figuratively, but as a hard-driven goal:
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." - William J. Casey, CIA Director .
42 years later, the words of William J. Casey, CIA director still resound as we cross the Rubicon in our Republic form of government. Here's one thing we know for certain, the proclamation that Director Casey made is far from complete, but what we also know that there has been no lack of attempts made in doing so.
The know that we've increasingly abandoning the MSM so they try to set up their mockingbirds in the alt-media in an attempt to corral us again.
Thank you.
It seems that the whole board needs a few lessons in sorting out the clickbaiters and discarding them.
Excellent post! Paytriots operate to much the same capacity as delineated so eloquently by OP.
Remember folks, anons do their good work for free. Anyone claiming to be part of the Q team (or allows others to insinuate as much) and sticking their hand out for your cash and clicks is no better than any MSM pundit. Be careful who you follow.
apologies for the post yesterday. Adding this website to the shit list o7
winn, you're a legend. Love your quality posting (far more than I could do).
It's curious, because I've seen at least 3 of our prolific posters post NewsPunch stuff to the board in the last two months. And, because they are prolific posters, they draw attention and a lot of folks fall for the BS, before it gets exposed. But the mods also sticky some of my posts in this area, so I think in the end its actually good.
Gives the newcomers a run for their money. What doesn't kill you makes you stronger.
It takes a while for the larps to trickle through the community, making the role of those who catch on quicker and expose them all the more important. And they catch the flak of "muh infighting, muh division, muh same team" 😂😂😂 imagine the logic of that
Godbless fren and ty
PS. If you take a read, and do a b it of analysis, their approach and pattern becomes immediately obvious.
I mean, for Pete's sake. "Fact-Checked Double Tick"? Bwahahahhaha.
Your opinion of Infowars?
Thanks for asking. I don't pay attention to Infowars, as I think there are infinitely better sources for the information I want to access. But generally speaking...
I saw in real time how Jones attempted to hijack the Q movement (2018), use it for his personal gain, with Jerome Corsi, and as such, I generally adopt the position that IW is controlled opposition.
My impression is that they oversensationalize, but do not indulge in out-and-out fabrication in the way that NewsPunch and REAL RAW News do.
I have many friends who only started waking up with the advent of Covid, and I've observed the destructive (IMO) impact of disinfo websites targeting the newly awakened. However, I'd be more comfortable with those friends tuning in to Jones than taking the lies of NP etc, for real.
As long as people are sincere in searching out the truth and in developing their discernment muscles, then eventually operations like Infowars will be swapped for better sources as the truth seeker matures. But operations like NP etc, inject informational poison and actually retard the awakening process, imo.
The difference is that most of what AJ tells us ends up coming true at some point while RealRawNews is utterly fanfiction.
Yeah, its curious. One wonders whether Alex Jones actually isn't a double agent or something. I mean, one one hand, controlled opposition, but on the other, apparently a big factor in beginning the red pill process for a LOT of people.
Is he secretly a double agent, while his handlers think (thought) he was doing controlled oppo for them/ Or was he perhaps flipped sometime after the Q operation gained traction?
About the article from free spoke I understand that the headlines are misleading but are they really it's clear by reading Obama's quotes that he's worried about the truth getting out. We definitely have to watch out for clickbait though
Thanks for the comment.
I would put to you that they are not simply 'misleading', but are in fact complete fabrications, aka out and out lies and disinformation. Also, we should be aware of the purpose and intent behind an operation that spreads this stuff.
They are more than sensationalist. Would you think they are merely 'misleading' if the subject of the article was Q and anons? "Q advocates for the overthrow of the United States government"? Would you be as tolerant of such lies if the target audience was the normies and the lefties, instead of anons and truth seekers who are struggling to wake up to see the distinction between truth and lies? I would not.
IMO, one real problem here is that the headline plus the first few paragraphs actually destroy the true picture of what is going on. By being lies, they inherently undermine truth. They poison, and trigger reactive responses that most anons are attempting to be free from.
Another problem is how these sorts of lies perpetuate old models of behavior that the Cabal have groomed in use for generations.
What's the difference between a normie simply swallowing CNN lies about DJT, because they play right into his prejudices, and a truth seeker who simply swallows fabricated lies about people like Obama, Clinton, et all, because those lies play into our views? No real difference, in terms of thought process, and behavioral response. The same behavior is being recruited and facilitated.
The lies and clickbait perpetuate emotionally reactive responses and approaches to truth. They simply redirect it. Thus, awakening folks simply end up trading one matrix for another, instead of building the discernment muscle that values real truth, whether it makes you feel comfortable or not.
Anyway, that's my view.
Did Obama say what the free spoke headline says he did?absolutely not. Are the quotes mentioned IN the article from Obama(with sauce being CBS interview) very telling on where he's at with the independent media not following the same script as the cabals MSM ? Absolutely! and with that hint of panic why wouldn't he eventually call for a all out ban on all independent media?
Appreciate your view and I'm sure we are mostly on the same page.
You don't eat a delicious serving of Lasagna if the top layer of cheese is laced with cyanide. And even if you were starving, and could somehow remove the top layer of cheese, would you still offer that lasagna to your children, your family?
I wouldn't. And not to press the point too much, but that's how I see this article and all of the NewsPunch content. (Obama's interview is out there in the regular world of information, and it could be posted and dissected without the poison, if someone wanted to make the effort.)
Anyway, likewise fren. Appreciate the response and the contrasting perspective. It's how we grow.