Looking like former GCHQ boss Hannigan quit back in 2016 after getting pressured by Obama to spy on the Trump campaign.
(twitter.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
Comments (12)
sorted by:
Stickying this to get Anons to dig and find the origin of these docs. They seem pretty powerful stuff, but where they just declassified? As part of what?
The twitter account itself seems to be pretty small, so not sure if this is fake or not. Lets dig!
Further information from the same account:
https://twitter.com/Scotland1Party/status/1669874240823107584
This document has been available since 2018.
More detailed report
The Scotland group are very credible they are based on Lt Col Bosi’s Australia1 group.
Is that so? I missed this connection.
See my comment about Judge Napolitano. Sounds like where there is smoke there is fire on this one. Interesting that in the Forbes article they say Napolitano was debunked because Mike Rogers said there is no evidence that Great Britain actually did spy on Trump at Obama's request. Maybe they said no, but that doesn't mean Obama didn't ask them to.
Interesting if GB indeed did not do the spying. Considering the GCHQ boss resigned, I would think they put in a new guy who did spy. But then, thats why they have "five eyes".
Interesting also that Trump has always been warm towards the Queen. If GB did indeed not do the spying, and instead tipped off Mike Rogers, perhaps it was ultimately coming from her.
I like to thing that she was under duress all those years and finally found the freedom with Trump.
Forbes said that Mike Rogers said?
He testified before Congress so unless it's CGI that's what he said. They only show the clip where he says the British did not spy though, not the clip that talks about whether anyone asked them to...
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/mar/20/nsa-british-intelligence-trump-wiretap-spy
I remember when Judge Napolitano on Fox talked about how GB helped spy on Trump or something along those lines. Then he was gone for awhile, and came back totally whipped. Wonder what they threatened him with. Does anyone remember this?
Nevermind, found it!
https://www.forbes.com/sites/brettedkins/2017/03/21/fox-news-sidelines-legal-analyst-napolitano-over-baseless-wiretapping-claims/?sh=1441b3ddc841
Okay I am back because WOW how can I still be surprised at how full of shit the MSM is? From the article:
"Fox News should bar Napolitano from the network permanently. Not only did Napolitano spread false allegations that a former U.S. president broke the law and conspired with a foreign ally to spy on a political rival, but he damaged the network’s attempts to remain credible in the Trump era. Fox News commentators regularly agree with President Trump, but when he openly lies, and those lies are contradicted and rebutted by every reputable source imaginable, the network risks ridicule and permanent marginalization by blindly standing behind the president.
Nor is this the first time that Napolitano has endorsed a ridiculous and unfounded conspiracy theory. Napolitano is a 9/11 truther. In 2010, he told a conservative radio host, “It’s hard for me to believe that [World Trade Center 7] came down by itself.” He continued, “It couldn’t possibly have been done the way the government told us.”
This week, Fox News wisely benched a member of the far-right conspiracy machine. It should do so again in the future, before the wild theories of its so-called analysts damage the network’s credibility permanently."
It is indeed not the first time he was whipped into submission.
This 5 minute video was the first whip. It is not about 9/11, it is much larger than this:
What if: https://yewtu.be/2RYYMOz8iAw?t=5
Very powerful questions that should have wakened up everyone.
Napolitano disappeared from fox and came back later in an advisory capacity.
And it is also quite clear what the reason is Trump would not consider him for SCOTUS.
Who did he appoint?
Amy Coney Barret.
What did she rule on especially in relation to what Trump is now going through?
Yup!
Another patriot in the shadows who will not kill himself if he gets to testify on what he knows.
thats funny, didn't MI6 set up Papa D in london ?
but this story makes you believe GB did not spy on Trump.. Isn't every questionable person in the Spy PP Dossier linked to MI6
So use the Prestige of Blechley Park to fool the public. and while we are at it, leave no assumption or history unquestioned, what really happened at Blechley park, if this is the setting that is used to make us believe the brits were not full on NeverTrumpers.
First I have heard of Project Fulsome.