why the hell would you believe what is on the posted claim which apparently came from Wikipedia as well
I didn’t. Read the comment I replied to and use that as context.
Here, I’ll help you out:
You said:
Something is off. The Wikipedia page reads completely different that what is shown in the "Early life" section here. Different names for parents, different birthday, etc. The father's name by the photo above is even different than shown in the "Early life" section.
To which I responded:
go through the history.
Then you said:
History only means someone covered/corrected the discrepancies…
Sorry, I couldn’t stop laughing after discrepancies. Is that what you call it?
It doesn’t confirm anything.
No, it doesn’t confirm anything because Wikipedia is not a credible source. Sure, you can convince some normies it is, but for the rest of us… lol.
I didn’t. Read the comment I replied to and use that as context.
Here, I’ll help you out:
You said:
To which I responded:
Then you said:
Sorry, I couldn’t stop laughing after discrepancies. Is that what you call it?