1
Furecrotch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Usc and statues are codifications of public law.

And no, A1S8C1 is not where the definition of “income” is at

Correct, like I said: If you’re looking for a single source (which I think you are) you won’t find it. Instead you have to “connect the dots” so to speak.

Simply doing a word search is the epitome of laziness, as it requires the least amount of effort. Reading is where the reward is. “Income” is a form of taxation, so again, start with the articles I linked and go down the rabbit hole.

The only way to win is litigation and that requires understanding.

If you just want some copy paste nonsense, try https://www.freedomlawschool.org/ or https://capitalvsincome.com/

1
Furecrotch 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m referring to public laws, for example: https://www.congress.gov/97/statute/STATUTE-96/STATUTE-96-Pg1211.pdf

And no, Cornell is not an authoritative source but it’s better than nothing.

If you’re looking for a single source (which I think you are) you won’t find it. Instead you have to “connect the dots” so to speak. An example: Public Law 86-624 says that statutes are limited by their definitions. So now you would need to understand the definitions and how they apply to you. Define “employee”, “employer”, “trade or business”, etc… they all relate to businesses.

I did a full text search

Don’t take this personally but being lazy won’t get you far: https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S8-C1-1-1/ALDE_00013387/

1
Furecrotch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Amendments (or bill of rights) is part of the constitution but not the constitution.

Forgive me for not giving you a straight answer but when it comes to this topic I want people to actually do the work.

E: you may need to rely on Supreme Court rulings and public laws for rulings that point to the exact interpretation, that may give a hint to where it’s located within the articles.

1
Furecrotch 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s in the constitution as business profits.

Are you a “trade or business” (per irc)

3
Furecrotch 3 points ago +3 / -0

Their methods require you to wait until you get a NOD. Not that great of a plan. Imo your better off reading and understanding the rules (usc 26) and file as a NRA. You’d have to do the work yourself but the reward is worth it.

3
Furecrotch 3 points ago +4 / -1

Who sowed said seeds of doubt? Identify the source, identify the problem.

2
Furecrotch 2 points ago +2 / -0

I didn’t get any good photos from my phone but I got a nice Timelapse of catch me if you can

1
Furecrotch 1 point ago +1 / -0

But does the chemicals fall off with it or is that already absorbed into the body.

4
Furecrotch 4 points ago +4 / -0

I usually use a alcohol pad and wrap it with scotch tape (because Ireland tape handles alcohol too well)

2
Furecrotch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Loose a life, gain a kingdom.

2
Furecrotch 2 points ago +2 / -0

It’s crazy how many people don’t understand how law works.

Not defined in The constitution -> state law

Not defined in state law -> left to the people.

Delegation of authority left it up to the people so the state took control.

Our laws are written by good people for good people. It only works if good people are in control.

1
Furecrotch 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every Jew alive is a fake jew (converted). The real “Jews” died with Jesus.

23
Furecrotch 23 points ago +23 / -0

If you’re not already on a list, you’re doing it wrong.

1
Furecrotch 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re using their rules for you. If you want to sue, use your rules for them.

E: meant to make a top level comment, not a response. I’ll leave it as is.

view more: Next ›