They jump up, sneer at you, and then overturn the game table where you had them in check, soon to be mate. It is going to get ugly; that is the what now?
The GJ indictment includes references to Killery. Should make information specific to those references eligible for rebuttal which requires entrance of evidence. Is this inability to do so? If so, this is protecting the FBI protecting her.
So NOW "how do you legally introduce evidence?" We know what they are hiding. They know we know. What is the next move?
The government said in that filing that Trump and Nauta’s lawyers had “no objections to this motion or the protective order.”
They jump up, sneer at you, and then overturn the game table where you had them in check, soon to be mate. It is going to get ugly; that is the what now?
FBLie, Obama and Iran imho.
The GJ indictment includes references to Killery. Should make information specific to those references eligible for rebuttal which requires entrance of evidence. Is this inability to do so? If so, this is protecting the FBI protecting her.
It does? Where? No one else is saying this.