you've stated your position... just looking for some substantial evidence. the evidence presented for the planes is all very sketchy at best. a handful of eyewitnesses, a handful of tapes released well after the fact, and... oh yeah, a passport, rofl
the collapse was clearly a controlled demolition that had nothing to do with any planes. the planes transponders showed them lingering suspiciously at other airports, leading some to believe they actually landed there.
no personal videos of the event were released until many hours after... ...and those videos have been shown to be manipulated. the evidence is strong enough for demolition and against planes that I personally don't believe the proof you're looking for exists. it will definitely take more than a remastered video of a guy glancing upwards.
i guess we're on the same page about there being a fireman there at all before the impact of the first plane. a bit odd, but i suppose its more of those "drills" that always seem to turn disastrous
"clearly" is a bit of a stretch, and the footage is rendered even less substantial because of the 'remastered' label. so sure, added to the list
There were planes and Bin Laden was CYA.
.....and they blew up building 7.
you've stated your position... just looking for some substantial evidence. the evidence presented for the planes is all very sketchy at best. a handful of eyewitnesses, a handful of tapes released well after the fact, and... oh yeah, a passport, rofl
Just pointing out that I am onboard with the rest of it, just not the CGI airplanes or shaped charges on every load-bearing member of both towers.
a passport...... 3 missing planes, 221 dead people.
Video of it from asshole to breakfast time.
What constitutes substantial evidence 22 years later?
the collapse was clearly a controlled demolition that had nothing to do with any planes. the planes transponders showed them lingering suspiciously at other airports, leading some to believe they actually landed there.
no personal videos of the event were released until many hours after... ...and those videos have been shown to be manipulated. the evidence is strong enough for demolition and against planes that I personally don't believe the proof you're looking for exists. it will definitely take more than a remastered video of a guy glancing upwards.
i guess we're on the same page about there being a fireman there at all before the impact of the first plane. a bit odd, but i suppose its more of those "drills" that always seem to turn disastrous