911 cgi glitch
(files.catbox.moe)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (27)
sorted by:
A 1 kW UHF TV transmitter broadcasting from the top of a mountain with a huge antenna doesn't get anywhere near the 40 mile range advertised for that remote control system. Also, there's a lot of tall buildings in the area to mess with the signals. That might make those last second maneuvers a bit challenging for a remote operator.
There was not a guy with a joystick guiding the plane in. Laser guided technology. The 'planes' were guided missiles, essentially.
https://man.fas.org/dod-101/sys/smart/lgb.htm
I like that explanation a little better. But I still don't see how a laser dot makes the wings tilt at the end of the journey.
You should publish all this somewhere online, rather than point out little bits and pieces here and there. Apologies if you have already.
Anyhow, so lemme see if I got it right. The UHF control is for the majority of the flight and there's an agent somewhere near the towers painting a laser target for the flight termination system? And they used bigger engines special ordered for just these planes that don't throw off the balance like those troublesome large GE engines did with the 737 Max.
I'll put this on the list of possibilities, but we're not at the top yet.
I'm responding to an aspect of the 9/11 Inside Job, posted by the OP. The CGI 'theory' is one of the most obnoxious and unproven out there. As you can see, I've already gone much, much further in explaining my theory than others in the thread. You don't seem nearly as concerned about their lack of evidence or yours, if you believe there were no planes and CGI was used. I have posted extensively about 9/11 over the last 20+ years on multiple forums. And I actually do appreciate this discussion we are having.
You do have the gist of the execution. Systems were switched over during the targeting phase ( flight termination ). Transponders were turned off, allowing flight plan path to remain undetermined. ie. we have no idea where they came from. Final laser targeting could have been either ground or air based. It was one or the other. Was it the Dancing Israelis? I always wondered about that. The E-Team art project, a group of Israelis that had access to the buildings for nearly a year, erected their 'art installation' within FEET of Flight 11 impact point. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kPOsF86oNoQ // I would consider that coincidence a very smokey gun.
As for the engines, I said 'more powerful', not necessarily larger. Zakheim had an existing contract with the Air Force to retrofit 36 Boeing 767's into fuel tankers. Engine upgrades would have been anticipated for increased loads and Military spec. A 767 is significantly larger than a 737, also.
I don't consider the 'tilt' extraordinary and I don't understand how it's evidence of CGI. Anyway, the plane ( drone ) potentially encountered a small turbulence associated with the building or it was a slight, last second adjustment of the computerized flight control system.