So... My thoughts on the Titanic sub...

They found the landing piece and the rare cover,.. but can't find the hull?

From what I remember from past Cameron documentaries, the bow was already flooded and submerged when it broke away from the stern half and sank to it's final resting place. Not much broke away from it.

It was the stern that, not yet flooded, imploded from the water pressure as it sank, and the insides scattered across the debris field and the distance the stern traveled with the current from the bow.

My original thought is the sub didn't even make it all the way down before it imploded,.. that it imploded and the hull got carried with the current.

But then I though,.. why would the landing piece and rear cover be so close together, yet they can't find the hull?

So my next thought was, as some people have pointed out,.. what if this was a hoax, and, like with 9/11, something else happened, a the landing piece and rare cover are duplicate pieces placed to look like the wreckage,.. much like after the pentagon, plane pieces had been placed to look like a plane hit the side of the building.

Repeat, same playbook?

And another thing... What we know of Titanic, intentionally struck to kill the most influencial men that would have stopped the federal reserve from controlling the central banking system,... wouldn't that make the Titanic scandal the original #OceanGate?

Are these comms? It could have been a sub accident any other place,... but this was specifically at the Titanic's grave.

I dunno. I'm not a smart person, but it's 'too' coincidental to just be a coincidence, mathematically right?