I notice you have nothing to say about the issues. Just a put-down. Based on ignorance.
I've seen Q proofs, the ones involving objective evidence, not obscure, leading, ambiguous questions. The latter aren't proofs at all; they are challenges or tests. It occurs to me that a lot of us are failing them miserably by simply buying the paranoid narrative.
The Q team is perfectly capable of sending a metaphorical message to the cabal by crushing one of their members via sabotage in front of one of their shrines and then blasting it across the media. Remember the message the Q team sent the cabal by blowing up the Georgia Guidestones?
I do not agree with every take people have on this site, but I do not bash them for their speculation. This website is for speculative discussions. Q is anything but objective- there is always room for interpretation. Also, if you read what I wrote previously, you shouldn’t be offended- unless you are a paid shill! Read what I wrote!
Prove that the "Q team" blew up the Georgia guidestones, a monument so completely inconsequential that no one knew of it until it was blown up. It was some jerk, caught on camera, with a satchel charge. What a futile action. If that was a Q op, Q should be embarrassed. A waste of effort and a terrible risk of bad publicity.
Read the frontispiece: This website is for the development of ideas and arguments with which to red-pill normies. Nothing about crazy speculation.
Q post 706 shows kill brackets targeting a rectangular object [-]. The Guidestones were destroyed on 7/6. Furthermore, there was NO federal investigation announced to show that the government was ‘doing something’ about this terroristic act. None. But look, if you really need a King Kong sized dick slap to the face of truth, look no further than speaker McCarthy being elected after 15 votes on the day a 5 year old Q post says ‘15 good win’. This is all choreographed at the highest levels.
Lastly, you develop ideas and arguments by speculating. Speculation is part of the thought process. If you lack the ability to speculate, you lack the ability to think. Try harder.
I've got nine patents under my belt, so my ability to think outside the box is healthy enough. (There are other invention disclosures that were never taken to patent status.) I have made speculations here before; no one picked them up to run with them (but that is no skin off my nose).
I'm not impressed with coincidences. They happen all the time in the real world, and they mean nothing at all. They have no magical or mystical or causal significance. So far as the guidestones are concerned, it was an act of vandalism, which is NOT a federal crime. As far as I know, the state police agencies conducted an investigation, resulting in video capture of the culprit (but no identification). Hard to call it terrorism, when it happened far from anyone.
As for meaningful Q posts, it is the art of Nostradamus: make predictions of vague reference and meaning, and people will contrive interpretations to fit events. Not proof. Maybe enough to prompt a "hmmm...." response.
I notice you have nothing to say about the issues. Just a put-down. Based on ignorance.
I've seen Q proofs, the ones involving objective evidence, not obscure, leading, ambiguous questions. The latter aren't proofs at all; they are challenges or tests. It occurs to me that a lot of us are failing them miserably by simply buying the paranoid narrative.
Here’s what I have to say about the issues:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16bPnstMu9/apparently-there-is-a-link-betwe/c/
The Q team is perfectly capable of sending a metaphorical message to the cabal by crushing one of their members via sabotage in front of one of their shrines and then blasting it across the media. Remember the message the Q team sent the cabal by blowing up the Georgia Guidestones?
I do not agree with every take people have on this site, but I do not bash them for their speculation. This website is for speculative discussions. Q is anything but objective- there is always room for interpretation. Also, if you read what I wrote previously, you shouldn’t be offended- unless you are a paid shill! Read what I wrote!
Prove that the "Q team" blew up the Georgia guidestones, a monument so completely inconsequential that no one knew of it until it was blown up. It was some jerk, caught on camera, with a satchel charge. What a futile action. If that was a Q op, Q should be embarrassed. A waste of effort and a terrible risk of bad publicity.
Read the frontispiece: This website is for the development of ideas and arguments with which to red-pill normies. Nothing about crazy speculation.
Q post 706 shows kill brackets targeting a rectangular object [-]. The Guidestones were destroyed on 7/6. Furthermore, there was NO federal investigation announced to show that the government was ‘doing something’ about this terroristic act. None. But look, if you really need a King Kong sized dick slap to the face of truth, look no further than speaker McCarthy being elected after 15 votes on the day a 5 year old Q post says ‘15 good win’. This is all choreographed at the highest levels.
Lastly, you develop ideas and arguments by speculating. Speculation is part of the thought process. If you lack the ability to speculate, you lack the ability to think. Try harder.
I've got nine patents under my belt, so my ability to think outside the box is healthy enough. (There are other invention disclosures that were never taken to patent status.) I have made speculations here before; no one picked them up to run with them (but that is no skin off my nose).
I'm not impressed with coincidences. They happen all the time in the real world, and they mean nothing at all. They have no magical or mystical or causal significance. So far as the guidestones are concerned, it was an act of vandalism, which is NOT a federal crime. As far as I know, the state police agencies conducted an investigation, resulting in video capture of the culprit (but no identification). Hard to call it terrorism, when it happened far from anyone.
As for meaningful Q posts, it is the art of Nostradamus: make predictions of vague reference and meaning, and people will contrive interpretations to fit events. Not proof. Maybe enough to prompt a "hmmm...." response.