As some may know, the SCOTUS docketed the Brunson case on June 22nd. They began hearing the case and should have a decision by Saturday June 24th. The results would lead to annulment of the 2020 Election which would dissolve the Biden Administration and the majority of Congress for not investigating the fraud of the 2020 election.
SCOTUS could have denied it on Thursday but are continuing arguments. The case was accepted under a rule 11. A rule 11 has never been docketed in this manner by anyone outside of a federal government case that was brought in the 1970's. Rule 11 means the case is of imperative public importance (SCOTUS had to decide that and docket this in that manner).
Prayers up warriors - I know the Brunson case has received many critics but this would definitely qualify as a swamp flush.
Yep. If SCOTUS makes a ruling, but the MSM never reports on it (or worse, says the opposite happened,) who's to say otherwise?
Interesting timing that we just had Murdering Joe Scarborough talking about how SCOTUS has no credibility now because of the fAr RiGhT.
The election was basically a flex to see how far they could push exactly that, from my point of view. That they can say Biden won against all evidence to the contrary, against all evidence of burned Trump votes, shredded ballots in trucks, and "lost" and "mismanaged" ballots, the Bellwethers, the number of counties, etc.
They wanted to see how far they could jam through using the government and Mockingbird apparatus.
I'm so sorry. How is your husband doing?
I kinda blame covid for my current heart blockage because they closed down the gyms and most kinds of exercise really don't work well for me and actually cause more stress than less.
nattokinase, lumbrokinase and dreambody.clinic
(((Big Hugs))) I'm sorry. I hope he is recovering well.