Why did H-wood glorify TITANIC as a tragic love story?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (55)
sorted by:
I believe it was to play on peoples' empathy...the mindset is now "Leave the wreckage alone, let them rest in peace", instead of where we are "bring it up to prove it's the Titanic" ... I had a friend arguing how they can't anyway because it would cost too much money. My counter was but we can send trillions to a country for a war that has 'nothing' to do with our country...logical thinking is dying very quickly...
I think what they don't want you to find is the sinking was not by an iceberg but an explosion. It is the Titanic down there--too many articles were brought up and on display but the hole in the hull has never been investigated. Did the iceberg story start by someone on deck that knew the explosion was going to happen? Did he survive to tell his story. Jus sayin!
There was no "hole." The collision was a glancing contact that carved a gash along the hull, spanning too many of the internal anti-flooding compartments. Impossible to obtain with an explosion, nor was any explosion mentioned by any witnesses. The iceberg was SEEN. My God, do your research.
I'm not saying it's 100% that you're wrong. But god are you such a fucking shill. Every time I see your name, you're towing the mainstream story/explanation for nearly every topic. And you do it in such a assured almost condescending manner, as if you know your position is of absolute fact. You're basically the resident agent Smith of this forum.
Yep. The golden rules: If it’s on mainstream media, it’s a lie. If it’s bulldozed, it’s a false flag to hide evidence. School shootings, 9/11… If the government gives it away for free, it’s bad for you If it’s a law, it’s to protect the cabal and it’s agenda, not you