This NY Post article isn't particularly strong, IMHO. It's trying to highlight this slow-walking of the HB laptop issue as being the crux of the steal while deliberately downplaying the myriad of other election fraud issues that were occurring at the time.
So that means they could've stopped the fraud if they wanted to?
This NY Post article isn't particularly strong, IMHO. It's trying to highlight this slow-walking of the HB laptop issue as being the crux of the steal while deliberately downplaying the myriad of other election fraud issues that were occurring at the time.