What bothers me is that none of the evidence presented has been enough to convince even a large minority of the public that the steal happened. Where is the smoking gun, the incontrovertible proof that fraud happened on a massive scale, and evidence to implicate even one person?
As soon as the cardboard went up in the windows to block the poll watchers and they were locked out of the room, that was the end of the fair, unbiased election.
Nothing else after that matters at all. Nothing.
Because non-transparency was executed by force. Therefore any reasonable person would have to assume [they] were lying and cheating, and hiding to cover up the lying and cheating.
What bothers me is that none of the evidence presented has been enough to convince even a large minority of the public that the steal happened. Where is the smoking gun, the incontrovertible proof that fraud happened on a massive scale, and evidence to implicate even one person?
As soon as the cardboard went up in the windows to block the poll watchers and they were locked out of the room, that was the end of the fair, unbiased election.
Nothing else after that matters at all. Nothing.
Because non-transparency was executed by force. Therefore any reasonable person would have to assume [they] were lying and cheating, and hiding to cover up the lying and cheating.
And that's exactly what happened.
Still not proof of fraud, and no legal requirement for them to have windows. You can't prove anything from that.