What you see is what we've got. There are no fancy "space weapons." We've been trying to build them since Project Defender in the 1960s, and the Strategic Defense Initiative in the 1980s, and the Airborne Laser in the 2010s, but the ideas all get shut down.
In the 1960s we had direct-ascent ASAT nukes (Air Force). Later, we now have direct-ascent kill vehicles (Navy). So, that's worth something.
Wonder what the naming conventions of a proposed future/current Space Fleet would be.
It’s obligatory at least one will need to be named Enterprise.
But the rest would be open for debate.
What you see is what we've got. There are no fancy "space weapons." We've been trying to build them since Project Defender in the 1960s, and the Strategic Defense Initiative in the 1980s, and the Airborne Laser in the 2010s, but the ideas all get shut down.
In the 1960s we had direct-ascent ASAT nukes (Air Force). Later, we now have direct-ascent kill vehicles (Navy). So, that's worth something.
A Space Shuttle was already named that, but never went into space (test article).