There are several books on the subject and a very good debunking page that takes all the conspiracy points to a confrontation with reality. To emulate the treatment I have received here previously, go do your own research. (Hint: There was no ship swap. The serial numbers on the propellers are identification. Etc., etc.)
The serial numbers of a propeller (something that literally can be unbolted even though its size makes it difficult) is better evidence than pictures of the differences between the window layout on each which is then compared to the pictures of the ship at the bottom of the ocean?
Ask yourself how the serial numbers get added to a propeller. In my pleasure boat experience, they are stamped into the brass/bronze. It would seem trivial to stamp a different or even additional serial number onto a propeller and use its existence as “proof”. Changing out the window arrangement would be much more difficult. No?
They were either cast with the propeller or engraved. You can't "unbolt" the propellers except in a shipyard, which is a big and costly operation, impossible to conceal, and both it and the Olympic would have had to be present (and out of service) simultaneously. Never happened. The propellers on the Titanic are those on the Titanic. The Titanic is the Titanic, based on detail differences in the superstructure. And there is no evidence that the Olympic was other than what it is.
The only relevant question is whether there is any EVIDENCE of a substitution. Speculative "What ifs?" do not count as evidence.
And what if the Titanic hadn't sunk and the key figures were rescued alive. Then what? Don't you see that you are entertaining a conspiracy for which absolutely everything would have had to work perfectly in order to attain the objective? After too many improbabilities, when does it become improbable?
There are several books on the subject and a very good debunking page that takes all the conspiracy points to a confrontation with reality. To emulate the treatment I have received here previously, go do your own research. (Hint: There was no ship swap. The serial numbers on the propellers are identification. Etc., etc.)
The serial numbers of a propeller (something that literally can be unbolted even though its size makes it difficult) is better evidence than pictures of the differences between the window layout on each which is then compared to the pictures of the ship at the bottom of the ocean?
Ask yourself how the serial numbers get added to a propeller. In my pleasure boat experience, they are stamped into the brass/bronze. It would seem trivial to stamp a different or even additional serial number onto a propeller and use its existence as “proof”. Changing out the window arrangement would be much more difficult. No?
They were either cast with the propeller or engraved. You can't "unbolt" the propellers except in a shipyard, which is a big and costly operation, impossible to conceal, and both it and the Olympic would have had to be present (and out of service) simultaneously. Never happened. The propellers on the Titanic are those on the Titanic. The Titanic is the Titanic, based on detail differences in the superstructure. And there is no evidence that the Olympic was other than what it is.
The only relevant question is whether there is any EVIDENCE of a substitution. Speculative "What ifs?" do not count as evidence.
And what if the Titanic hadn't sunk and the key figures were rescued alive. Then what? Don't you see that you are entertaining a conspiracy for which absolutely everything would have had to work perfectly in order to attain the objective? After too many improbabilities, when does it become improbable?