But Federal Continuity Directive 1, placing the US under a COG, was signed Jan 17, 2017 (I misquoted that above) and Federal Continuity Directive 2, replacing FCD 1, was signed June 13, 2017.
FCD 1 was signed under Obama. It doesn't place us under a COG.
Neither does FCD 2 which came under Trump.
If you look into this, you see that these are just updates of COG plans. This happens about once a decade. There's no evidence the plan was put into action.
Thanks for your polite response. I agree with you that these two documents don't comprise the whole continuity plan and don't explain how the military is in control, or how the government is under a COG. They are a part of the picture. They have to be read within context of Laws and Orders, UCMJ, Military Justice Act, Executive Orders, National Emergencies, Law of War Manual, etc. Have a great day!
Secondly of the key pieces of the Universal Code of Military Justice is Article 2 Article 2 says who is subject to the military law. I am not. Almost all civilians are not. The people subject to the UCMJ is spelled out here. I'm no lawyer, but he is way off base here https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/802
I haven't read that. I know that there are 41 National Emergencies still active, including the 9/11 emergencies.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_national_emergencies_in_the_United_States
But Federal Continuity Directive 1, placing the US under a COG, was signed Jan 17, 2017 (I misquoted that above) and Federal Continuity Directive 2, replacing FCD 1, was signed June 13, 2017.
Hi,
FCD 1 was signed under Obama. It doesn't place us under a COG. Neither does FCD 2 which came under Trump.
If you look into this, you see that these are just updates of COG plans. This happens about once a decade. There's no evidence the plan was put into action.
This is simple contingency planning.
Thanks for your polite response. I agree with you that these two documents don't comprise the whole continuity plan and don't explain how the military is in control, or how the government is under a COG. They are a part of the picture. They have to be read within context of Laws and Orders, UCMJ, Military Justice Act, Executive Orders, National Emergencies, Law of War Manual, etc. Have a great day!
You're quite welcome.
I did look into this recently. Someone posted a video of someone talking about all these. Derek Johnson, that's who is in the video.
You can read my full comments at the link below I remain highly dubious of this.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16bPeXqlx1/x/c/4Tv8u8zBRUG
A taste: Bottom line: I don't think understands these laws, directives and orders
He said the US Supreme Court said military laws supersede all civil laws.
Um what? Was he really in the military? First off the Universal Code of Military Justice is a civilian law. He just told us it passed as part of a military authorization act. It's part of the US code. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title10/subtitleA/part2/chapter47&edition=prelim
Secondly of the key pieces of the Universal Code of Military Justice is Article 2 Article 2 says who is subject to the military law. I am not. Almost all civilians are not. The people subject to the UCMJ is spelled out here. I'm no lawyer, but he is way off base here https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/802
Uniform*
It's Uniform Code of Military Justice.