Repeatable experiments have proven the "comm channel" has been demonstrated and proven.

I have studied undergraduate physics for years. "Comm channel" is not a thing. Same with your "non-local communications", that term has nothing to do with physics and is used exclusively by New Age charlatans.

What you're probably thinking of is quantum entanglement, a phenomenon caused by a widespread misunderstanding of the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. A misunderstanding that is cleared up by Stochastic Electro Dynamics (SED). See this article:

https://www.barrysetterfield.org/Quantum_Effects/Quantum_Effects.html#introduction

All Atoms exist in an energy field

This is correct, it is called the "Zero Point Energy" (ZPE), and the interaction of particles (electrons, protons, neutrons) with this field is what gives those particles mass.

an atom isn't solid, it is 99.99% energy

An atom taken in isolation isn't in any state of matter at all, solid or otherwise. States of matter specifically describe the energy state of a collection of atoms or molecules. Also, mass and energy are interchangeable, something being described as "99.9% energy" is a functionally meaningless statement.

I saw operational code being developed under DARPA programs back in the 1980s that were already communicating directly with the human brain.

These are called Brain Computer Interfaces (BCI). They require a target to either wear a headset full of electrodes in contact with the scalp, or require the target to have electrodes implanted in the brain via surgery. This is not new, and you can explore this facet of neuroscience yourself with DIY kits. You will rapidly discover that voices and thoughts are impossible to detect or implant in the brain even with electrodes, much less remotely without any equipment. The human brain is far too complex, and thoughts far too non-localized within the brain, to interact with, detect, or influence except by normal verbal communication.

You are right that emotions, especially high amounts of stress, can provoke a response in DNA expression. This is no different than any other physiological response, and has nothing to do with "non-local" communication. Given that your brain is talking to your cell's DNA, it is very much local communication transmitted by molecules and chemical reactions.

Human DNA cannot be accessed "non-locally", your definition of non-local communication has no basis in reality. The only way to modify DNA is to blast it with ionizing radiation, use mRNA tech, or use CRISPR. Useful for inducing diseases and deformities, and not much else. Likewise, you cannot track someone by their DNA unless they leave some of it behind at a given location. DNA is not a homing signal.

Graphene oxide is in the death jabs, but its function has not been demonstrated at all. Back when the graphene oxide hysteria was first picking up steam, I could only find one proof-of-concept patent for how graphene oxide might be used to create a transistor. To say that a communication device can be built from a transistor is like saying you can build an F-150 because you created a single bolt for its engine block when you haven't even built the engine block yet.

To be clear, graphene oxide is dangerous to have in your body. The fact that it is present in the death jabs in unacceptable, but that does not mean it can communicate with things outside of your body. That claim has not been proven in the slightest.

All atoms communicate with all other atoms in the entire universe.

Uh, no. Not even close. Atoms cannot communicate because they are not intelligent. Communication requires an intelligent sender, an intelligent receiver, and an intelligible code or signal.

we are indeed programmable and AI can indeed find you through your DNA signature and download.

1. Humans are not programmable. We are more than the physical matter that makes up our bodies. We are not just biological machines.
2. Unless you leave traces of your DNA everywhere you go, you cannot be tracked by your DNA. And the Deep State doesn't need your DNA to track you anyway, you already carry a tracking device with you that actually exists and works.
3. Download? An AI program can "download" your DNA from your person without a tissue sample? Please, do explain how that works.

Obviously you are unaware of this. No problem. Most people are unaware.

Ah, condescension, the tool of people who knowingly spout nonsense and don't have the evidence to back it up.

Yet, within the scientific community this is widely understood.

The scientific community widely understands that "non-local communication" is a joke.