SCOTUS *FINALLY* rules 6-3 that Queers Cannot Force Businesses to Make Shit for Them
(archive.is)
LET'S GOOoOoooo!!!
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (113)
sorted by:
My aesthetician rejects waxing male clients because their genitals are extremely difficult to wax. Is that discrimination in your eyes? She always knew she wouldn’t accept male clients and has been in her profession for 20+ years. Do you consider her choice the “wrong” business decision? 🤔
There are those who do wax male clients, she has just made a personal decision not to. Would you tell her she’s wrong? 🤔🤔
I would shy away from giving LEGAL advise.
My reaction to your question would be that IF your aesthetician SPECIFIES in the "qualifications" or "capabilities" or "services offered" that she doesn't provide her service to males, then she would be (in my opinion) safe and NOT discriminating. Similarly, you can't require a plumber to fix your electrical device. It's outside their expertise or field of services offered.
If, however, she ADVERTISES that she provides her services to everyone, then if she turns down a male customer because he's male, then there's a problem. IMO
Similarly, if the plumber offers "Plumbing and Electrical Services" and won't fix your electrical device because you're a male, then there's a problem. IMO
This is only my opinion and NOT offered as legal advise.