https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/the-most-damaging-paper-of-the-pandemic
Head on over to Peter McCullough’s Substack for the details and please consider subscribing to his Substack. He’s terrific, a great friend, a great scientist, and a man of great courage.
This is a pre-print so not yet peer-reviewed.
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4496137
I’m sure they will try to get this paper killed. It is amazing that The Lancet is a teller of truth in this case.
The paper shows 74% of deaths post-vax could be attributed to the vaccine being a cause of death.
The results are strongly consistent with the Schwab paper where 71% of the deaths appeared to be consistent with a vaccine death:
They basically were looking for the “cleanest” proof of death, but it’s likely that all 71% of the cases (25 out of 35) died from the vaccine, it’s just harder to “prove” that.
The question we all should be asking is why are we first hearing about this now? How could all of the CDC’s analyses show no relation to the vaccine? And why aren’t we allowed to see them?
Now that you said that I believe it will happen. 😁
Over the years I’ve watched what seems to be random comment after comment on GAW become facts. Most are never posted as “what I think will happen” but are seemingly random comments under a post.
Sometimes I’ll see a comment that strikes true but I haven’t seen it anywhere else. Then it begins to morph into something over the following days, ends up as a popular post and finally arrives as a happening!
One of my favorite things to do here is spot the psyop creating a new narrative for Anons to grab ahold of. For whatever reason this aspect of the plan fascinates the hell out of me!