I read it as well, and I think he's saying that the obstruction was for moving the boxes out of the storage area. However, the search area specified was also included the TALMAC area, so moving boxes out of storage but still in that area was not obstruction.
The prosecutor changed the wording in later submissions ignoring that fact and basically lied to the court.
I think anyway, it's very leagaleezy.
We need the Robert Gouveia decode.
I read it as well, and I think he's saying that the obstruction was for moving the boxes out of the storage area. However, the search area specified was also included the TALMAC area, so moving boxes out of storage but still in that area was not obstruction. The prosecutor changed the wording in later submissions ignoring that fact and basically lied to the court. I think anyway, it's very leagaleezy.
Best deconstruct yet