CBDC Rollout may require changing The Constitution - BIS - uh how bout no!
(bombthrower.com)
🤑 BANK CONTROL CBDC
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
The key to money exchange is easy to use and low stress of purchase.
If the bartering system does not require a bunch of hoops just to get a loaf of bread.
I am all for it.
The most important resource in the world is not money.
It's time.
Whatever system we go to. The shopping experience has to be as fast and easy as it is now.
I get security due to working as a software engineer.
Security cannot exceed customer experience.
That is what we have been taught. That is exactly how they sold us their system. Because it is so easy, we accept a useless intermediary, or something they have a monopoly on. It doesn't need to be that easy. People survived for thousands of years using barter. Who knows, maybe tens of thousands of years. Maybe hundreds of thousands of years.
A thing is hard if you don't know how to do it. It is easy if you do. For example, using a computer is hard. Someone who has never seen a computer would have quite the time figuring out even how to turn it on, must less how to send an email or even what an "email" is or why one would want to "send" one. But for us, it's trivially simple and intuitive, because we have been doing it our whole lives.
Bullshit. The "shopping experience" we have now is designed to make our things worthless to us. We are consumers. We don't buy what we need, we buy what we want, BECAUSE the shopping experience is so easy. We don't value what we have. We don't value what we buy. We buy it and we immediately don't give a fuck more often then not. It is rare when we buy something and are happy with the purchase down the line.
Your vision is clouded by the exact things it is intended to be clouded by; the packaging of "a modern economy", You are ignoring what's inside.
Regardless, the system I have described requires minimal effort in transition (stocks, multiple metals, art, property, etc. all serving as stores of value).
Customer experience is trained to be flighty, to look for the "easiest way out." To not try or want to try, in anything we do. That is our fundamental training so that we don't value anything, including ourselves or our lives.
A true "awakening" is going to be a whole lot more than just an understanding of the Cabal. It will include an appreciation for how our thoughts and beliefs have been constructed by them to keep us placated, stupid, blind, and perpetually handing over our resources to them.
I suggest people will learn the value of things and the value of themselves. That will be a true awakening, and learning how to barter will be a part of that, even if we make barter really easy to do (as I have suggested).
LOL!!!
You are living in a DREAM WORLD lol!
I suggest you take a freaking course in SALES and MARKETING!!
Humans NEVER decide on what they NEED! Humans decide what they WANT!!!!
Humans think EMOTIONALLY first. Then use LOGIC to rationalize the decision.
You cannot change the way our brain functions.
TIME is the most important thing due to the fact you cannot get it back
If your new system requires more time to shop. NO ONE is going to use that crap!!!
As I said.
If I want a FREAKING LOAF OF BREAD!
I want to be able to get that bread QUICKLY!
Why?
Every decision a person makes is a "trade-off".
If I got to the store and want a loaf of bread. There is an opportunity cost associated with me spending time getting the bread.
I could have used my time on something else.
What it sounds like to me.
You don't care if the system adds a bunch of time "waste" to the equation.
Look.. I support your system "IF" it's quick to use. I am not going to support a system that makes me jump through hoops just to get a loaf of bread.
So I am on your side "IF" those conditions are met.
Why is there always an assumption of "ignorance" if someone disagrees? It is so common to find that assumption. My stance is not based on a lack of study on these topics, but on an abundance of it.
Specific to this discussion is the idea of a value added cost:
A value added cost is a perception of increased value based on knowledge of a product. In this case my hypothetical increase in value (that people would be willing to do just a little bit more to engage in barter over a single currency) comes from an understanding of the fraud of our modern economy, and that we have been guided to consume instead of exchange goods. I suggest that with such knowledge there would be additional value in exchange, and a rejection of the consumption ideology. Thus people would be willing to work towards an exchange mentality, even if it takes a bit more effort.
Of course if the effort is too great (the cost too high, too much time involved, etc.), then it won't be adopted, but why would you assume it would be too great? Nothing I have said suggests that. I have only suggested that there would be additional knowledge required and, minimally, more effort. I never implied it would be onerous and I have no idea why you think it would be. As I said, it was likely the method of exchange for as many as hundreds of thousands of years. It's doable.
People will always do what they feel they need to do based on the information they have available to them at the time a decision is made. THAT is the fundamental driving principle of human action. Different knowledge mutes some choices and amplifies others, but in all cases, it is the perception of "need" that drives the decision making process.
In our case "wants" have become the primary driver, because we have been purposefully trained to refuse our needs, and look to our wants as needs. That pushing of "wants" as "needs," and the confusion of "needs" is the primary function of propaganda, which is literally everywhere, and all has a single source. It is that purposeful confusion that drives our "consumer" nature. That is NOT our natural state, but a derived and purposefully created state; a training, a brainwashing.
People need to relearn the difference between "need' and "desire." Once people realize the fuckery that led to the confusion, our whimsical nature will be much reduced. Transitioning to a slightly more complicated, but much more engaged method of exchange will become trivial at that point. A value added cost that everyone will feel is worthy of their time.
I'll tell you what.
Give 3 to 5 shopping situations.
Write it out step by step and tell me how it will work.
You seem like a smart guy. I am assuming you have this figured out to be so confident it will work.