CBDC Rollout may require changing The Constitution - BIS - uh how bout no!
(bombthrower.com)
🤑 BANK CONTROL CBDC
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (47)
sorted by:
What is "better"? Why is "more efficient" "better?" Who told you that?
Don't get me wrong. I have been an engineer, scientist, and computer scientist for much of my life. I've been a manager and efficiency expert. My whole life was about creating efficient systems. Did I make anything better? No, not a whit. Not a single life was enhanced by an increase in efficiency, at least not on the systems I worked on in the corporate world. I did make the corporations I worked for a whole lot of money though. So maybe I made a few fat cats a little fatter.
Having said that, I still think there is merit in the idea, but the point is, not all increases in efficiency in one place equate to a "better" overall condition. Very often, in fact I would go so far as to say, almost always (in our present system), they are work towards a worse overall system, if we include in our measurements things like the mental, physical, and spiritual health of the individuals who live in the world.
Yes, an excellent question.
Meh, maybe. I think the main problem is a lack of knowledge. It isn't what the FED can do, but how they are able to do it. They are only able to do it because of a lack of knowledge. If people knew they would reject the system. If allowed to progress organically, we would then transition to something else, something that came from the Gestalt of Many Minds. I suggest we would transition back to a modern version of barter. That suggestion comes from having spent the past 3 years studying the entire history of economics and Cabal fuckery through Money Magic, Law Magic, and Religion Magic (which includes Science as a religion).
Why do we need "loans" at all? For thousands, probably hundreds of thousands of years, loans, if they existed at all, were almost certainly very rare. A debt based economy is a fraud. We need loans now because of the fraud they set up as our system of "a modern economy". It is not fundamental to a working economy, but to a enslaved populace.
We don't need no stinking loans, not ever. It is a completely unnecessary system.
I suggest your conclusion is incorrect because your assumptions are incorrect, and you are basing them on a faulty understanding of history. I don't blame you, it is hard to figure this shit out or find the evidence. It has been obfuscated purposefully to prevent us from doing so. I suggest the "Gold Backed System" is in fact Controlled Opposition. It could be a worthwhile transition to help people learn the knowledge they are currently lacking, but it is not sufficient, and will inevitably lead directly back to the same problem we have today, or perhaps the same problem we had in the 19th century (which was almost identical to the problem we had today) when the Rothschilds and Rockefellers and their ilk owned the whole world (they still own it today, but that was when those two families made their biggest moves to the top of the Cabal totem pole).
I suggest you read my report linked previously. It will be very enlightening to you I think.
I don't have the time to read all of this.
The bartering system will not work in 2023. You seem to be very idealistic here.
It won't work unless you can show me the details.
You mean my report (book) or my previous response?
If you mean my report, I suggest you give it ten minutes. If you like it up to that point, read it. If not, don't.
It's important to appreciate what it is. It is an exposition of how our economic world was created. If that isn't understood, then the solution can't be understood. So if you want to understand how we get out of the mess we are in, without falling back into it, then it behooves you to read it. It is an evidence based report. It is mostly not me "saying stuff," but rather showing the evidence. Me "telling how it works" is far less useful for helping people understand than me showing what the system really is, and how it was constructed.
Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it. Thus, my report, is history, shown in primary references. Not the way it is taught in school, but the way it should be taught in school.
Again, give it ten minutes. That's all I ask.
There is "what we can do now," and "what we should be working towards." Both are important to keep in mind. The only reason it "won't work in 2023" is because people don't understand the history, and what the real problem is. I suggest this conversation is a perfect example of that. If people knew, then it would work perfectly fine tomorrow. Transitioning would be easy, if people were sufficiently motivated. All the elements required already exist.
This is why I have said several times now, that I think a gold money system might be good for a transition, as an initial stepping stone to teach people the depth of the fraud. If we stay there though, we lose. It is itself a fraudulent system that will lead straight back to Cabal control of the world.
I have played a few situations out in my head of how it will work. It seems like it will be more of a pain in the ass to do it.
There would be a much greater waste of time when looking to settle on goods and services.
This is why I asked.
Can you walk me through 5 different use case situations?
Step by step to see how this would work. I want to see how fast can I purchase something. I want to see what additional hoops would I have to go through to buy something.
Well, I've really already done this, but I'll do it again with a touch more detail. If you want something more than what I am presenting, you will have to ask specific questions, because it's really rather simple.
Ok, let's say that company stocks are used as a store of value. Let's further say that every stock in a company is tied to an NFT, making it unique, and it's transfer secure. Let's say that such a transfer is as simple as a phone app.
Now you go to the store, you want to buy groceries. You and the store look up the current relative value of the stock, and you transfer however much of your stocks is determined to be an equivalent value to the groceries to the grocers stock account.
Done.
It is as easy as it currently is, but you have traded something you value, something that (presumably) pays you dividends. Something that everyone values (dividend paying stocks), for something else everyone values, food in this case, and the grocer has done the same.
Now let's say that you don't have any stock, but you have some silver in your pocket. Now you want to buy groceries. You go to the grocery store and, since silver has real value, you again both look up how much silver is "worth" and decide on an "equivalence" transfer. How exactly we determine relative value is uncertain, but it could be as simple as having a "standard candle" by which everything is measured against. This can be problematic, because supply and demand could cause day to day shifts in everything, but if you use something like gold, it will remain stable enough on a daily basis that any shift will be meaningless compared to our current "inflation".
I don't know if such a standard is really the best way, but it's not a bad place to start.
Now let's say that all you have is apples. Trading them with the grocer is a good idea, since they like apples pretty much all the time. What do you want to trade your apples for? They have stocks, they could give you some. Then it's as simple as it is today, except your stocks are actually worth something, real value (dividends and production). They have silver, so you could trade them for silver, again, something that has real value. But maybe you just want eggs, so instead you see if they will trade them for eggs. You might have to do a little haggling for the eggs, but that's OK, it's a good skill to have. Maybe you don't want to take the time to haggle, because you think being an "efficiency expert" is a better way to live. In such a case you might just want to take the easy way, and go for silver or stock, then go buy eggs with silver or stock.
It's not a complicated system. It's really quite simple really. It's just a transition to an appreciation that many things have value, and can be traded. The actual act or art of trade can be as simple or as complex as a person wants it to be, just like it was for countless thousands of years before we were seduced by Babylonian Money Magic, which ended up enslaving the world.