God’s children are not for sell
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (12)
sorted by:
And where did the dissolution of these laws lead us to today?
rampant divorce, pornography, 60 million dead babies, child sex trafficking, single momes, traumatized kids, trannys, aids as a gay mans disease.
The proof is in the pudding.
Make Christ King of America.
You're explicitly proving my "missing the forest for the trees" point.
And you're avoiding the unmistakable devastation wrought by opening pandora's box of fornication, divorce, abortion, adultery, sodomy.
No, I am telling you that the legalization of having sex in other positions than old school missionary once every year did not "open the box".
We live in a free society -- or we are supposed to -- and the problem was created for many reasons, not least of all due to the repression of people.
What happened when alcohol was made illegal? Black markets surfaced, violent crime focused around it, and people ended up getting more drunk than they were prior to the ban.
You conflate it as being a reason for child trafficking; that's not true. Child trafficking has existed for literally thousands of years. THOUSANDS of years. As has literally everything that you outlined.
"Illicit" sex always happened, it being "illegal" didn't stop it, it just led to more government intervention when you were accused of it.
Abortion has always happened too, in small numbers, but the difference here isn't due to sexual freedom but a willful destruction of morality, with people specifically teaching people that it is good.
Back in MY school days, we were told to focus on protection to avoid unwanted pregnancies; apparently in schools today they are just being told to raw dog it. This isn't due to the removal of anti-sodomy laws, this is due to many more factors -- not least of all the older generations allowing it to get to this point to begin with.
And now the big one:
Divorce is a specifically tough law to make unless you have conflicting morals yourself.
For those religious among us, how can you make the argument that divorce should be illegal whilst also saying the government should have nothing to do with it? It is an oxymoron.
If you believe that marriage should be a religious thing and not a legal thing, then you cannot make laws against divorce because then it turns it into a legal thing. And when it became a legal thing, then it became something related to freedom under the Constitution, which was the avenue used to push gay marriage.
The Constitution protects rights that may not align with your personal ideals, but it is there for a reason. If you don't like that, I have the same answer I have for leftists who hate this country: Go somewhere else.
Sorry if that sounds harsh, but the Constitution transcends religion because it encompasses those who aren't religious.
This is all a long winded and over explained point to say: You cannot police other people's liberties. You will not win, you will be seen as a tyrant, you will not grow your cause. Instead, you win through culture. You keep your culture alive, you teach your children good morals, you teach them to seek out people with similar beliefs.
For example, no fault divorce would matter a lot less if everyone in the country respected marriage more and sought out people of similar beliefs, e.g. a male and female both believe that they are choosing a spouse for life, not until the next person with more wealth, more power or better looks comes around.
You win by culture, not by creating law to dictate other people's lives. You lose in America when you do that, as our current masters will learn.
Not true, if you're talking about the current Constitutional construct, divorce, sodomy, porn, contraception etc. can all be dealt like abortion. Relegated to the states who have the police power to enforce morals.
As a matter of political theory, they should all be outlawed as unfitting for civilized nations.