Saint Billy Graham has a long history of being adored by leaders of both parties. Not one of them have spoken ill of him, and he has never spoken ill of any of them.
Fiona Barnett has screamed relentlessly that she when she was a young teen, she was raped by Ted Turner, Richard Nixon, and Billy Graham. These people are certainly not connected by their faith or politics, so if she invented this, why would she choose such an unrelated combination of people to accuse?
in 2005, Bill Clinton joined Billy Graham on the stage and Graham proudly announced he had been a democrat all his life. Whoa---was the reverend unaware the democrats are the party that has worshipped abortion for a long time?
Suddenly, in 2016, at around the age of 97, Graham has a turn of heart, and makes essentially comes out to support Donald Trump. It seems so uncharacteristic.
The white hats would have known evangelicals were very uncertain about mogul Donald Trump and would need such an endorsement.
Q said "We have it all." I imagine some white hats approaching Graham with a set of videos and say "hello Reverend. How would you like to keep your legacy in tact?"
Crazy? Possible?
No, that was a huge liability. Sure it would get more VOTES based on people's ignorance. But so would all kinds of lying and broken promises, so where is the line drawn?
Even if Fiona's accusations are untrue, Billy Graham has had an obvious role in his professional career as being at the same time the world's most successful street preacher and a symbolic high priest to the Deep State. That means he was essential in maintaining the psy op to bridge the hearts of American evangelicals to the long line of controlled or criminal thugs in D.C. and the White House.
Every time Graham appeared at an event with a president or other politician, giving his Miyagi spiritual counsel and blessing those holding office, the effect was immediate and deliberate: to get Christians to literally foster affection and sympathy for these goons.
This was very obvious, way before Trump came along. I see no reason for White Hats to deliberately hitch Graham's "Jesus Loves the Deep State" agenda to the Trump campaign, because for those with eyes to see it was another red flag that Trump might not have been a true outsider. A Graham endorsement, his Freemasonry, his pro Israel stance, etc... all that together caused questioning as far as his true political independence.