Here are some of the things that Andrew Tate is famous for.
“I think the women belong to the man.”
“Females are the ultimate status symbol. People think I’m running around with these hoes because I like sex. That’s nothing to do with the reason why I’m running around with these bitches. I got these bitches just so everyone knows who the don is.”
“I go out and fuck and I come back to her and I don’t care about her and I only love my girl. That’s not cheating, that’s exercise.”
“I was getting on a plane and I could see through the cockpit that a female was the pilot and I took a picture and I said, ‘most women I know can’t even park a car, why is a woman flying my plane?’ and they banned me.”
“I had one girl and she got too drunk one day and she threw up in my apartment. I told her to clean up, she refused. So, I took her stuff and threw it out the window.”
“If you’re a 55 kilo female, I will pick you up with one hand, by your titty.”
“How can I use these women to make me money? I don’t wanna put them on the track because they’re my women, I don’t want other people touching my chicks.”
“They’re like, ‘you’re under arrest for a suspicion of assault of this dumb hoe.’”
“If we talk about tradition—traditionally—every single man in history had multiple wives, and there was not a single woman who was celebrated for having multiple husbands. Female promiscuity has always been disgusting and frowned upon.”
People can grow and change. I'm not supporting Tate's words and actions of the past in any way. But he's on fire in this interview. I totally get that his personality and style are highly off-putting. But he made a heckuva lot of good points in this piece.
He isn't a messenger at all, he just reiterates when most others are saying and have said for many years before he came about. He came from nowhere onto the internet just about overnight, that is very suspicious indeed, those who do that are DS stooges a la Ladyboy Gaga or limited hangouts.
I will give him the benefit of the doubt and say he is just a famefag touting for attention.
Could be. I had never heard of him either. That Tucker and other big platforms are giving him a podium to state his position is what I find interesting.
FWIW, I don't think I've ever heard anybody else state opinions attacking the entire mainstream culture like him. He pulls no punches and doesn't care what anybody else thinks. That's as rare as it gets in this day and age.
The only other person I can think with any degree of celebrity that speaks so openly without caring what others think is Alex Jones, maybe David Icke. And while Tucker is a friend of Alex, quietly, he hasn't yet invited him to do an interview. He knows just how much controversy that would generate for him.
If the cabal is backing Tate, they've made a strategic mistake any way you slice it. Tate's appeal to the macho, masculine demographic out there is unmatched as far as I can see. He's waking a lot of them up out of their stupor.
FWIW, I don't personally care for his underlying message in the least. He doesn't appeal to my sensibilities even a tiny bit. But he is making waves, which is why I find his sudden appearance on the scene interesting.
I'm reviewing a video done by two Youtubers that I really trust regarding the criminal charges against Andrew Tate. If what they show and discussed is true, then Andrew Tate is a morally-bankrupt human trafficker, just like Jeffery Epstein...
...
Tell me why GAW and MAGA (or at least their biggest influencers) are exalting Andrew Tate again?
Sure, let's go with the innocent until proven guilty. However, looking at the evidence that is released so far, including actual text messages taken straight from victims phones and witness statements, and collaborating it with what Tate has put out there online, Tate's dead meat. Not helping is that Youtube creators have proven with video evidence that Tate lied about his activities (and also lied in his interview with Tucker Carlson).
So, while it is true that it is "innocent until proven guilty," Tate's looking mighty guilty of human trafficking. And unlike with the case with Assange and Trump, we have concrete evidence, from the victim's themselves and Tate's own words.
Just warning to you all that if or when Andrew Tate is found guilty of human trafficking, everyone associated with MAGA and GAW NEEDS to disassociate themselves from Tate and his associates. You can't be against human trafficking (especially of minors) and then exalt Andrew Tate at the same time. The hypocrisy will greatly push back what is coming.
And while we are on the subject of trafficking minors, Andrew Tate did traffic a minor, and she is one of the victims testifying against him.,,
Fair enough. I literally have almost no knowledge of his activities. I've heard a few rumors, and I've heard his general defense that the people involved in his activities were all "being paid" to go along with his schtick. And no, I don't endorse any of it of course. But I also don't get involved with telling consenting adults what they should or should not do unless they ask my opinion.
If he did in fact knowingly traffic one or more minors, he's going to have to pay the price accordingly, in this lifetime or the next. I
t's always difficult to determine if things come down to "he said vs she said" if that's the case. If the weight of evidence is convincing one way or the other, than so be it.
And don't get me wrong, I'm not in any way defending Tate. But it does appear to me that the cabal/establishment is trying to shut him up. My spidey-senses are on full alert to this fact. And that's why I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt at this stage.
Why would Tucker Carlson interview him if all this well known and undeniable? Seems like he made quite the strategic mistake in validating Tate if so. With all the resources and money he has, you'd think he would have been able to easily vet Tate and steer clear of him, wouldn't you?
And with the money and resources at the cabal's disposal, how hard would it be for them to pay off one, five, ten, fifty, heck even a hundred "witnesses" to testify against Tate? This is just standard daily procedure for them. Money, ethics and justice are of no concern to them.
And to wit, I do know full well that Tate made his many millions in the unsavory practice of convincing women to do sexual videos for TikTok. I don't support it in the least. But once again, what consenting adults choose to do is none of my business.
II don't know 1% of what you've heard and learned about Tate. If he's really as bad a guy as some are painting him, then Tucker, Valuetainment, Charlie Kirk and many other "truth tellers" in the alternative media are going to get a heckuva black eye for giving him a podium to state his case.
As such, I'm going to stick with innocent until proven guilty. Said another way, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend". My 64,000 foot view take is, the cabal/establishment is very obviously trying to shut him up, and they can use their fraudulent LEGAL SYSTEM lawfare to take him out.
And further, Tate is out there openly talking about the charges and his situation, holding very little back. If he was undeniably guilty, I'm quite sure his attorney's would have him fully gagged until after his trial. The risk is far too great that he'll say something that can be used against him in court. This is basic legal advice 101.
All this to say, guilty or innocent, good person or bad person, he stated some heavy-duty truths in that valuetainment video. Basically, that too many people, parents, families, men, are "standing down" and letting the cabal "raise their kids" and fill their minds with poison. It's a message the masses need to hear, even if it comes out of the mouth of a "bad guy".
In short, let's not shoot the messenger before the message is even heard.
It was indeed. Your comment was the only one that didn't castigate me into oblivion. It seems most people around here prefer to shoot the messenger over analyzing the message.
Love him or hate him, he spits some heavy-hitting truth, no holds barred. That's why I find value in listening to him. He reaches a certain segment of the population that doesn't resonate to the soft, well-reasoned, logical approach. They respond to someone getting up in their face. Tate is one such person that reaches this audience.
Todays message on GAW
Tim Ballard Bad
Andrew Tate Good
Here are some of the things that Andrew Tate is famous for.
“I think the women belong to the man.”
“Females are the ultimate status symbol. People think I’m running around with these hoes because I like sex. That’s nothing to do with the reason why I’m running around with these bitches. I got these bitches just so everyone knows who the don is.”
“I go out and fuck and I come back to her and I don’t care about her and I only love my girl. That’s not cheating, that’s exercise.”
“I was getting on a plane and I could see through the cockpit that a female was the pilot and I took a picture and I said, ‘most women I know can’t even park a car, why is a woman flying my plane?’ and they banned me.”
“I had one girl and she got too drunk one day and she threw up in my apartment. I told her to clean up, she refused. So, I took her stuff and threw it out the window.”
“If you’re a 55 kilo female, I will pick you up with one hand, by your titty.”
“How can I use these women to make me money? I don’t wanna put them on the track because they’re my women, I don’t want other people touching my chicks.”
“They’re like, ‘you’re under arrest for a suspicion of assault of this dumb hoe.’”
“If we talk about tradition—traditionally—every single man in history had multiple wives, and there was not a single woman who was celebrated for having multiple husbands. Female promiscuity has always been disgusting and frowned upon.”
Stunning and brave Watch out who you follow
Now make a list of all the disgusting things Trump has said in the past. I'll wait.
Well, you got a point there.
But still Tate is not a good person! There’s nothing good in that man. Nobody will ever change my mind on that.
We know Trump is a good man, because he’s proven himself to be one.
People can grow and change. I'm not supporting Tate's words and actions of the past in any way. But he's on fire in this interview. I totally get that his personality and style are highly off-putting. But he made a heckuva lot of good points in this piece.
Sometimes you gotta take the good with the bad.
Well, it’s funny because I just was saying that on a different post about somebody else. So I’m gonna have to support you on that.
Yes, people do change.
I know some of the things he says are lit, but overall I don’t care for the person.
Carry on!
No we don't.
Whats Tate's opinion on DJT?
Dunno. But we can be assured that everybody has one.
Looks like you prefer to kill the messengers. So be it.
He isn't a messenger at all, he just reiterates when most others are saying and have said for many years before he came about. He came from nowhere onto the internet just about overnight, that is very suspicious indeed, those who do that are DS stooges a la Ladyboy Gaga or limited hangouts.
I will give him the benefit of the doubt and say he is just a famefag touting for attention.
Could be. I had never heard of him either. That Tucker and other big platforms are giving him a podium to state his position is what I find interesting.
FWIW, I don't think I've ever heard anybody else state opinions attacking the entire mainstream culture like him. He pulls no punches and doesn't care what anybody else thinks. That's as rare as it gets in this day and age.
The only other person I can think with any degree of celebrity that speaks so openly without caring what others think is Alex Jones, maybe David Icke. And while Tucker is a friend of Alex, quietly, he hasn't yet invited him to do an interview. He knows just how much controversy that would generate for him.
If the cabal is backing Tate, they've made a strategic mistake any way you slice it. Tate's appeal to the macho, masculine demographic out there is unmatched as far as I can see. He's waking a lot of them up out of their stupor.
FWIW, I don't personally care for his underlying message in the least. He doesn't appeal to my sensibilities even a tiny bit. But he is making waves, which is why I find his sudden appearance on the scene interesting.
Tate moved to Romania because he felt like other countries were too strict on rape and he thought Romania wouldn't charge rich people with any crime.
The dude is a pile of dogshit who now is going to rot in a Romanian dungeon for the better part of a decade.
I'm reviewing a video done by two Youtubers that I really trust regarding the criminal charges against Andrew Tate. If what they show and discussed is true, then Andrew Tate is a morally-bankrupt human trafficker, just like Jeffery Epstein...
...
Tell me why GAW and MAGA (or at least their biggest influencers) are exalting Andrew Tate again?
Guilty until proven innocent, eh?
Sure, let's go with the innocent until proven guilty. However, looking at the evidence that is released so far, including actual text messages taken straight from victims phones and witness statements, and collaborating it with what Tate has put out there online, Tate's dead meat. Not helping is that Youtube creators have proven with video evidence that Tate lied about his activities (and also lied in his interview with Tucker Carlson).
So, while it is true that it is "innocent until proven guilty," Tate's looking mighty guilty of human trafficking. And unlike with the case with Assange and Trump, we have concrete evidence, from the victim's themselves and Tate's own words.
Just warning to you all that if or when Andrew Tate is found guilty of human trafficking, everyone associated with MAGA and GAW NEEDS to disassociate themselves from Tate and his associates. You can't be against human trafficking (especially of minors) and then exalt Andrew Tate at the same time. The hypocrisy will greatly push back what is coming.
And while we are on the subject of trafficking minors, Andrew Tate did traffic a minor, and she is one of the victims testifying against him.,,
Fair enough. I literally have almost no knowledge of his activities. I've heard a few rumors, and I've heard his general defense that the people involved in his activities were all "being paid" to go along with his schtick. And no, I don't endorse any of it of course. But I also don't get involved with telling consenting adults what they should or should not do unless they ask my opinion.
If he did in fact knowingly traffic one or more minors, he's going to have to pay the price accordingly, in this lifetime or the next. I
t's always difficult to determine if things come down to "he said vs she said" if that's the case. If the weight of evidence is convincing one way or the other, than so be it.
And don't get me wrong, I'm not in any way defending Tate. But it does appear to me that the cabal/establishment is trying to shut him up. My spidey-senses are on full alert to this fact. And that's why I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt at this stage.
Why would Tucker Carlson interview him if all this well known and undeniable? Seems like he made quite the strategic mistake in validating Tate if so. With all the resources and money he has, you'd think he would have been able to easily vet Tate and steer clear of him, wouldn't you?
And with the money and resources at the cabal's disposal, how hard would it be for them to pay off one, five, ten, fifty, heck even a hundred "witnesses" to testify against Tate? This is just standard daily procedure for them. Money, ethics and justice are of no concern to them.
And to wit, I do know full well that Tate made his many millions in the unsavory practice of convincing women to do sexual videos for TikTok. I don't support it in the least. But once again, what consenting adults choose to do is none of my business.
II don't know 1% of what you've heard and learned about Tate. If he's really as bad a guy as some are painting him, then Tucker, Valuetainment, Charlie Kirk and many other "truth tellers" in the alternative media are going to get a heckuva black eye for giving him a podium to state his case.
As such, I'm going to stick with innocent until proven guilty. Said another way, "the enemy of my enemy is my friend". My 64,000 foot view take is, the cabal/establishment is very obviously trying to shut him up, and they can use their fraudulent LEGAL SYSTEM lawfare to take him out.
And further, Tate is out there openly talking about the charges and his situation, holding very little back. If he was undeniably guilty, I'm quite sure his attorney's would have him fully gagged until after his trial. The risk is far too great that he'll say something that can be used against him in court. This is basic legal advice 101.
All this to say, guilty or innocent, good person or bad person, he stated some heavy-duty truths in that valuetainment video. Basically, that too many people, parents, families, men, are "standing down" and letting the cabal "raise their kids" and fill their minds with poison. It's a message the masses need to hear, even if it comes out of the mouth of a "bad guy".
In short, let's not shoot the messenger before the message is even heard.
Hus recent interview with Tucker was excellent.
https://youtu.be/ybXYvg6O7kI
It was indeed. Your comment was the only one that didn't castigate me into oblivion. It seems most people around here prefer to shoot the messenger over analyzing the message.
Love him or hate him, he spits some heavy-hitting truth, no holds barred. That's why I find value in listening to him. He reaches a certain segment of the population that doesn't resonate to the soft, well-reasoned, logical approach. They respond to someone getting up in their face. Tate is one such person that reaches this audience.