Since when do tornados sound like bombs?
(truthsocial.com)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (42)
sorted by:
Hey homie, ever heard of rocket triggered lightning?
Rocket-Triggered Lightning
Now imagine a modified wire guided missile (of which we already have) to be fired from above (plane) through the clouds to the ground.....
This seems like a form of DIRECTING ENERGY to me. Mr. Designer...
You want to play with word games? Go ahead. It won't change the fact that DEW stands for directed energy weapon, i.e., laser or particle beams. Particle beams were proven impractical in the 1980s.
Rocket-triggered lightning (as shown) is just another form of lightning rod. How do you propose to shoot a rocket to the ground and deliberately hit anything? That requires a guidance and control system and a targeting system to find the target. Do you realize how large such missiles are? Happy landings if the rocket takes a lightning bolt before it hits the ground. You are aware that airplanes must take special measures to dissipate lightning strikes while they are in the air? The province of a wild tantasy is that it doesn't correspond to anything that would be designed.
The end result is that neither DEWs nor rockets were present at a tornado, and tornadoes result in such drastic ambient pressure drops that houses will "explode" from the pressure the air still in them.
Im not the one playing word games. You think you are slick trying to dismiss 'DEW' as a round about way of saying 'this couldnt possibly be anything but a storm."
The definition of a DEW:
Not just lasers fren. BESIDES, we have plenty of weapons that could destroy this building under the guise of a storm. Oh, and we convieniently have methods to create storms.....And you have yet to bring any credible sauce that NO DEW can penetrate clouds.
You are just here to try and dismiss a discussion on a discussion board and forum slide if you can't accomplish that.
It reiterates what I said: lasers and particle beams. (Microwaves are cool. Didn't mean to slight them.) None of which had any appearance. I said lasers cannot penetrate clouds and they can't. I designed them and analyzed their performance. Particle beams can barely penetrate air. MIcrowaves are okay, but they don't have power levels that would produce explosive effects.
The easiest way for the building to be destroyed was for a tornado to pass over it. The differential air pressure is explosive (as I and others have pointed out).
You wouldn't know "credible sauce" if it stamped all over you. Since you know nothing about actual DEWs, you don't know what "sauce" would mean. Half the time on this board, the demand for sauce is entirely frivolous, because the demander doesn't even know what he wants---he just wants to make an impossible challenge. In your case, you reject expert knowledge. Infrared laser radiation is strongly absorbed by water vapor and even more by water droplets. Clouds are essentially impassible. And---clue for the wise---you can't see through clouds...and if you can't see, your targeting sensors can't see either. Ever shot at a target that you can't see? You must be a real fun guy to have on a midnight grouse hunt.
Besides, you have the burden of proof to establish that it was not natural phenomena. And proof is a hell of a lot more than sophomoric speculations about what might be possible with magic weapons.
From the definition one more time....
You clearly are lying about any expertise in this field. You didnt just dismiss microwaves. You dismissed any other form of energy not lasers or particle beams?
You original unqualified statement :
THIS IS YOUR STATEMENT. THE BURDEN OF PROOF IS ON YOU.
And lastly since I am done with your lying ass. I never said the event of the OP wasnt a natural event. I said there was a physical war going happening on our soil and has been for years. (btw, whats up with all the burning food production plants and train derailments?)
I then listed an anecdote from my personal experience that I thought was some kind of military action.
This is a discussion board. You are trying to dismiss a part of the discussion without any proof at all. Just fallacy and distraction from the discussion. You are making false statements and the only reason I kept talking to you up to this point is so that people could see you in action. If you are a shill and not just some know it all with too much college debt, you dont deserve to get paid for this weak ass attempt.