Be wary of gnostic thinking.
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (37)
sorted by:
Not too long ago, I had a long conversation with someone about the nature of government, law, and Sovereignty. Assuming the statements made within it are sufficiently complete to elaborate the problem, the only possible path out of our current situation is for each individual in the world (or some "critical mass") to fully appreciate the fraud of all governments that we understand today. I invite you to read it. I think it may be enlightening. It's one of my better posts, if I do say so myself.
That response is part of a larger conversation which itself is quite enlightening, but it meanders a bit. It does give a better context for that "final answer" post if you want to read the whole conversation. It begins from the top comment by bubble_bursts and my reply to it. In order to follow it, you will have to follow it down several branches, because unfortunately this reddit style format prunes the display of branches, and in some cases, the main thread continued down a different branch than my first response.
I don't address it in the conversation above, but the entire concept of "the left" and "the right" are purposeful contrivances designed to keep us divided and controlled. The ideologies of both sides are created for each respective group by the same controlling entity. Each side gets pieces of the truth, and then forced, by propaganda, to focus on the part of the truth they see, and the statement that "the other side is lying." This is how the whole world is run. The idea of Nationalism (as we conceive of the term in the authoritative legal sense) is itself highly problematic, and a fundamental fraud. Capitalism too is a fundamental fraud, as is "conservativism" (as is "liberalism") It is essential that we see these frauds or we will fall right back into the same trap we are in.
That requires more elaboration, but at the least read the first post I linked to above so that the elaboration will make sense. If you read the whole response tree it will make more sense, but again, it meanders a bit (though still, I think it is sufficiently coherent to recommend it).