If BTC has a value of 300$ then clearly it still holds value.
No, it's lost 99% of its present "value" ($30,000 -> $300). From its high of $68K or whatever, it will have lost 99.99% of its value. Thus, Bitcoin is not a STORE OF VALUE by definition.
Even gold and silver can become over priced. Whats the argument?
The precious metals markets are so completely MANIPULATED INTO OBLIVION in order to maintain the lie of fiat currency as to be unrecognizable. Nonetheless, they've never fundamentally lost value to the point where the energy/labor required to mine them is below cost. If it were, everyone would stop mining for them. That the present "value" barely rises above "cost" tells you what levels the manipulators can and still get away with.
In comparison to the amount of fiat that's been printed since 1971, the value of gold today should be in the $100K/ounce range in relation to the paper printed. This doesn't reflect the labor/energy required to mine gold based on fiat numbers, but rather the comparison of the value of gold pre-1971 in relation to the amount of fiat printed. The banksters have stolen the $98K/ounce of value over the past 52 years by also manipulating prices of oil, staple foods, etc.
Ultimately the "price" is meaningless in this discussion. The question is, when the system blows up, which it must, what can you get for an ounce of silver or gold? In Weimar Germany, a man bought an entire block of buildings in downtown Berlin for 3 ounces of gold. The "price" of those buildings was probably 70 kazillion utterly worthless Deutschmarks.
There was a time when an ounce of silver was worth an acre of good farm land in the US, whereas it would have cost many tens of thousands of military script "greenbacks" for the same land. We're in the same spot now. An acre of good farm land will probably run you $20-$50K federal reserve notes. And why is this? The bankster cabal has used the "rising price of real estate" to trick us into believing we're growing wealthy. When in reality, property value should remain static and structures should actually LOSE VALUE over time, just as a car or piece of equipment/machinery does.
So you've got to untangle all these ideas to see the deception. "Price" does not equal "value". "Currency" does not equal "money". But as long as people can't see the difference, the game of deception run by the cabal will continue and greedy people will always be taking advantage of the gullible people.
Coins like RVP are backed by Technology.
Never heard of it. If the "technology" can be sold/bought for the same price as all the circulating coins and all coin-holders are "Owners" of said technology, then you have something of value. If not, you've got yet another a ponzie scheme on your hands.
And it doesn't really matter either way as its now ultimately infected by Tether carwash tokens if it's being traded on crypto exchanges. There's no way around it. Guilt by association.
If RVP is a great technology then they can issue stocks and bonds like any other tech company in the world. Why would they want to be associated with the darkest of dark underbelly's of human slave trading and worse?
No, it's lost 99% of its present "value" ($30,000 -> $300). From its high of $68K or whatever, it will have lost 99.99% of its value. Thus, Bitcoin is not a STORE OF VALUE by definition.
The precious metals markets are so completely MANIPULATED INTO OBLIVION in order to maintain the lie of fiat currency as to be unrecognizable. Nonetheless, they've never fundamentally lost value to the point where the energy/labor required to mine them is below cost. If it were, everyone would stop mining for them. That the present "value" barely rises above "cost" tells you what levels the manipulators can and still get away with.
In comparison to the amount of fiat that's been printed since 1971, the value of gold today should be in the $100K/ounce range in relation to the paper printed. This doesn't reflect the labor/energy required to mine gold based on fiat numbers, but rather the comparison of the value of gold pre-1971 in relation to the amount of fiat printed. The banksters have stolen the $98K/ounce of value over the past 52 years by also manipulating prices of oil, staple foods, etc.
Ultimately the "price" is meaningless in this discussion. The question is, when the system blows up, which it must, what can you get for an ounce of silver or gold? In Weimar Germany, a man bought an entire block of buildings in downtown Berlin for 3 ounces of gold. The "price" of those buildings was probably 70 kazillion utterly worthless Deutschmarks.
There was a time when an ounce of silver was worth an acre of good farm land in the US, whereas it would have cost many tens of thousands of military script "greenbacks" for the same land. We're in the same spot now. An acre of good farm land will probably run you $20-$50K federal reserve notes. And why is this? The bankster cabal has used the "rising price of real estate" to trick us into believing we're growing wealthy. When in reality, property value should remain static and structures should actually LOSE VALUE over time, just as a car or piece of equipment/machinery does.
So you've got to untangle all these ideas to see the deception. "Price" does not equal "value". "Currency" does not equal "money". But as long as people can't see the difference, the game of deception run by the cabal will continue and greedy people will always be taking advantage of the gullible people.
Never heard of it. If the "technology" can be sold/bought for the same price as all the circulating coins and all coin-holders are "Owners" of said technology, then you have something of value. If not, you've got yet another a ponzie scheme on your hands.
And it doesn't really matter either way as its now ultimately infected by Tether carwash tokens if it's being traded on crypto exchanges. There's no way around it. Guilt by association.
If RVP is a great technology then they can issue stocks and bonds like any other tech company in the world. Why would they want to be associated with the darkest of dark underbelly's of human slave trading and worse?