It makes more sense than you trusting those who sell a false tale. It is not a matter of "trusting" anyone. (Bad reliance on argument from authority.) It is a matter of facts and evidence beyond dispute. If you are going to accuse "NASA" (a rather large organization) of being a monolithic liar, you need to document the specific lies and lay out the evidence for the truth. Not just argument for such alternatives, but evidence that they could only be the truth. Everything I have seen that some people purport to be "evidence" is only an instance of being ignorant of what is seen. With very little deviation from the rule, the doubters are those who are ignorant of the basic facts and principles. And unreasonably credulous to think that our then-arch-enemy, the Soviet Union, would stand by and give credit to a faked accomplishment that they were also striving toward. On matters of space science, NASA is still a good source. On matters of "climate science" (a whole different department), it is a pack of liars. If you can't tell the difference, you should not be in the business of making judgment.