Nothing I said is out of date, and referring to the GPS corrections means nothing to this argument, since I did not reject special relativity as a predictive theory. My "science background" came with 3 degrees in astronautics, including such things as fusion physics, orbital mechanics, fluid physics, and laser physics (truly quantum technology). Where are your credentials that you can imagine I am out of date?

String theory is a grand head trip, but increasingly seen as irrelevant because it cannot be experimentally investigated. As I am literate, I have little use (or patience) for YouTube expositions. You might profit to read the work of Halton Arp, regarding the major assumptions of modern cosmology, or the work of Frederick Kantor regarding the unification of quantum and relativistic physics. For many years, I took the Journal of Galilean Electrodynamics, which was nothing but exploration of alternative physical hypotheses. Before you attempt to clear the speck from my eye, go and remove the plank from yours. Put your attitude where your mouth is and look into more modern approaches.