Sent bro request for him to watch MMS Universal Antidote video and give me his opinion.

Here was his reply:

Chlorine dioxide is commonly added to public water (drinking water) at parts per million levels to kill bacteria, viruses, and other microbes. It is also used as a disinfectant in food processing. So, most people are already consuming it at the ppm levels recommended in this video. This video contends it is a cure-all at ppm levels. But people already consume it at these levels and still get all these diseases.

I think this video is just an advertorial for CIO2 containing products and I suspect that the people giving testimonials are paid spokespeople masquerading as real people .

I don't think these products hurt if taken a low ppm levels, since most people are already getting this through drinking water. But, I seriously doubt that adding a little more CIO2 to what you already get in water cures major diseases. I'd need a lot more evidence than a documentary by a nurse featuring hand selected (likely paid) spokespeople to believe that.

I think these MMS product manufacturers see that they can safely concoct a product with a chemical already in drinking water, knowing they will not have any issues with FDA approvals since its a commonly ingested chemical, and they can use the fact that CIO2 is actually an effective disinfectant to give the appearance of credibility to their fabricated fantastical cure all marketing story.

I want to get this reply right, to cause him to question what he states above.

First paragraph: What ppm do people use for MMS usually is what I need to determine. I read the maximum ppm for public water treatment and it's .8 ppm.

Second paragraph: As far as I know the main proponents behind MMS/CDS make no money off the product since it's obtained off of numerous sites not linked to Humble's team or Kalckers's.

Third paragraph: I think I can find enough testimonies on different sources not connected with UA video to convince him testimony is not hand picked/paid for. And depending on answer to #1 para that "little bit extra added" will be answered.

Fourth paragraph: "knowing they will not have any issues with FDA approvals" The opposite is true. People risk jail time for distribution of what is already in some drinking water. There is anything but acceptance of MMS/CDS product.

I can also point out that if Cl02 is already in drinking water, why does CDC page call it extremely dangerous, but he already conceded it's not harmful in right ppm range.

Just give me some of you thought and forming effective answer. I'm low brain energy today and need some help.

Thank you in advance.