Listen to what Donald Trump Junior just said in response to a question about who Q was...
He said he didn't know who it was but also "maybe he knows and he just can't tell you.." as he smiles and looks away...
Remember when Scavino posted the other day about how those who know don't speak?
(files.catbox.moe)
FIFTH GEN WARFARE
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
Q isn’t a “he”. Q is a group of less than 10 people, 3 of them non-military. Explicitly stated in the drops.
Yes. We understand. It's easier to simply say he.
Kinda rude to misgender Q but OK
“They” is only two more letters, and infinitely more correct. It's not "easier." You're intellectually lazy at best, and dishonest at worst.
Someone on here asked me to find a single instance of the word “they” being used as a singular pronoun before around the 1900s. I couldn’t do it. It seemingly has always been a plural pronoun in every context before the commies presumably changed it for their gender bender agenda.
Can somebody post Trump saying “wrong” for me? I’m on my phone and can’t lookup the code.
What is stated is that is the group that knows the full picture. Q in general can refer to a military intelligence group. But “Q” who does the posts is most likely one person. No one knows for sure, “he” is two less letters, and likely infinitely more correct.
u/#q60
You seem very certain about that.
Care to explain why?
I did say likely, which is different from very certain, but here goes:
A) Per post 60, there are at most 9 people that know the whole plan. I believe Q has to be one of them. Six military generals are going to be busy with their regular job and running their part of the show. I don’t think they have time of all this posting. That leaves very few options for who Q is and I don’t think it is multiple people on that list. It is possible that there are multiple people posting stuff, but it wouldn’t be consistent style and message if it was a group of people that all didn’t know the whole plan.
B) it just doesn’t seem practical that there are a group of people all with the login throwing stuff on there. Q is with the President often, aboard the plane, behind the scenes at events, etc. it isn’t practical that is a group of people. There is one person in those situations and controlling all the posts. Sure, the Q group might send a word doc with a post (or however they do it) and the single person is reviewing and posting,
While there are multiple people that contribute the the effort, I’m 95% confident there is one Q. And maybe it’s just a difference in what we are staying and how people talk.
“Did you read the new Obama book, it was a real turd!” Sure there’s editors and contributors and ghostwriters, but we still call the author as Obama
“The chef did a great job on our meal tonight!” Sure there’s prep cooks and sous chefs and multiple people with their hands in the plate but there’s one chef that controls everything and it’s the point person.
“I went and saw Taylor Swift and I was like ‘Oh my gawd, she did such a great show!’” Clearly there’s other band members and lighting techs and sound techs and all that stuff but it’s Taylor Swift. She put on a great show she’s the point person she’s in charge of everything
And I find it likely it’s the same with Q
If Q is one person, then failure of the Q operation would have been far, far more probable.
The operation has been an astounding success. That wouldn’t have been the case had we trusted one man with the task.
There are also multiple points within the drops where, if you are keen, you can notice Q talking amongst themselves….
You make good points. That doesn’t mean they are valid.