I would say it’s 1.1 - A deep state operation to stop the phenomena of Sound of Freedom by making people think: “who earns the money from that movie” and to instill a doubt whether it’s ok to go to the cinema.

The legal article the article quotes fits the person rescuing a child too.

Even Tim Ballard could face the same charges:

A person commits the offense of child kidnapping if he or she is not a relative of the child within the third degree and, knowing he or she has no right to do so, removes a child under the age of fourteen without consent of the child’s parents or guardian, or confines such child for a substantial period of time without such consent

I would assume it’s most likely a deep state tactic.