Yes. Those numbers for age of universe may not even be correct
You were talking about the Universe, not general things in society. Doppler shift observations have pinpointed the age of the universe to within a few hundred million years. It's rather retarded to assume established science may not correct because climate commies have distorted weather patterns into a political agenda, and then use that in a debate about known facts.
What is hilarious here is that there's actually no room in your tiny little head for you to possibly be wrong. As if we as humans have explained physics and cosmology perfectly, without error, yet we can't even predict the weather accurately. I remain open to being wrong and that is what separates us. Which means this conversation is over, goodbye.
This thread is about YOU. You turned my benign comment about the age of the earth and universe into a debate about YOU and your OPINIONS. You believe NOTHING other than your opinions. You accept NOTHING as truth because you're a skeptic to a fault. You think it's a virtue lol NOBODY CARES about your opinion if it's not based in fact. Just how old is the Universe MR. Skeptic?
Now, you gaslight me and insult my intelligence? I'm an actual skeptic. Sort through my posts here, especially concerning the Climate Change Psyop. You may learn something more than being an annoying nit.
The thing is the doppler shift interpretation is disputed, as are many of the various things "proving" big bang theory. Anyone in the field that questions/disputes BBT cosmology is drummed out, ignored, defunded etc (same treatment as anyone against AGW in climatology).
I personally don't think it makes a damn bit of sense that everything suddenly formed out of nothing in a REALLY REALLY YUGE explosion, and that the universe simply is (with parts of it coming and going like anything else).
You were talking about the Universe, not general things in society. Doppler shift observations have pinpointed the age of the universe to within a few hundred million years. It's rather retarded to assume established science may not correct because climate commies have distorted weather patterns into a political agenda, and then use that in a debate about known facts.
You go ahead and believe whatever you want. You do you bruh. I for one choose to remain skeptical.
I just realized you're a flat earther... lol
I was doing me, bruh.. I was explaining how old the universe and earth were and you chimed in with nonsense and downvotes.
What is hilarious here is that there's actually no room in your tiny little head for you to possibly be wrong. As if we as humans have explained physics and cosmology perfectly, without error, yet we can't even predict the weather accurately. I remain open to being wrong and that is what separates us. Which means this conversation is over, goodbye.
This thread is about YOU. You turned my benign comment about the age of the earth and universe into a debate about YOU and your OPINIONS. You believe NOTHING other than your opinions. You accept NOTHING as truth because you're a skeptic to a fault. You think it's a virtue lol NOBODY CARES about your opinion if it's not based in fact. Just how old is the Universe MR. Skeptic?
Now, you gaslight me and insult my intelligence? I'm an actual skeptic. Sort through my posts here, especially concerning the Climate Change Psyop. You may learn something more than being an annoying nit.
The thing is the doppler shift interpretation is disputed, as are many of the various things "proving" big bang theory. Anyone in the field that questions/disputes BBT cosmology is drummed out, ignored, defunded etc (same treatment as anyone against AGW in climatology).
I personally don't think it makes a damn bit of sense that everything suddenly formed out of nothing in a REALLY REALLY YUGE explosion, and that the universe simply is (with parts of it coming and going like anything else).