It will be interesting to hear Patel Patriots take on Jan Halper Hayes now since DJT has retruthed the original post.
Initially, he thinks an insider would not break opsec to say this in the media (mentioned during Devolution power hour on Aug 2) and the document stating bankrupting the corp, looked fake.
I don't think she is an insider, as the information she stated in that interview has been on this site for a long time. But she was able to recall and deliver the information in a very clear and concise way. I just wish her hands weren't shaking at the end but that can't be helped when the enemy is grilling you.
She said she is part of a DoD task force. Seems like insider to me but that is just my opinion
I am glad you mentioned "the information she stated". As there was a lot of information in what she said. My mistake in assuming the retruth was for the 1871 stuff.
DJT could have retruthed to any of the many points she mentioned like voter fraud, which could def be likely since DJTs case is on this.
Oh, that's true...she DID say that. Hmmm. Well, I guess it could be that the inner group declassifies a level of general information to be released by "helpers." Just enough to get people's attention and perhaps wanting to find out more details. Awakening the naturally curious human mind?
It will be interesting to hear Patel Patriots take on Jan Halper Hayes now since DJT has retruthed the original post.
Initially, he thinks an insider would not break opsec to say this in the media (mentioned during Devolution power hour on Aug 2) and the document stating bankrupting the corp, looked fake.
Is DJTs retruth kayfabe or no? 🤔
I don't think she is an insider, as the information she stated in that interview has been on this site for a long time. But she was able to recall and deliver the information in a very clear and concise way. I just wish her hands weren't shaking at the end but that can't be helped when the enemy is grilling you.
She said she is part of a DoD task force. Seems like insider to me but that is just my opinion
I am glad you mentioned "the information she stated". As there was a lot of information in what she said. My mistake in assuming the retruth was for the 1871 stuff.
DJT could have retruthed to any of the many points she mentioned like voter fraud, which could def be likely since DJTs case is on this.
Oh, that's true...she DID say that. Hmmm. Well, I guess it could be that the inner group declassifies a level of general information to be released by "helpers." Just enough to get people's attention and perhaps wanting to find out more details. Awakening the naturally curious human mind?