No. NDAs are contracts that private citizens voluntarily enter into.
Freedom of speech concerns the government not being able to censor citizens or retaliate against them for expressing their views, thoughts, etc...
But freedom of speech is not absolute. There are some limitations. For example, freedom of speech does not cover libel, slander, harassment, threats, obscenity, pornography, etc... There can also be limits placed on where, when, and how people may express themselves. Such as needing permits to hold a demonstration, and being able to use noise amplification like loudspeakers. Or in this case, judges put out gag orders or protective orders on participants in a case.
It's extremely concerning the misconceptions people have concerning free speech. Especially here. Somewhere along the line, people got the idea that free speech means we can say whatever we want, whenever and wherever we want. And that's simply not true.
Like, I said. They are free to not sign it. If they want to be involved with him, they can make the decision to sign. Trump didn't choose to be involved with Jack. Just like corporate restaurants, if you work for KFC, you chose to work there but you are not free to disclose the 11 herbs and spices because you sign paperwork that says you can not share proprietary information.
When I retired from the military I had to sign one that said I would never divulge any information that I had gained by working on a top secret job. They’re pretty common in the military sector. I had no problem signing it because I knew by discussing my job would allow certain projects to be compromised
He didn't sign one of those with Jack. Anyone is free to not sign one with Trump and not work with him.
No. NDAs are contracts that private citizens voluntarily enter into.
Freedom of speech concerns the government not being able to censor citizens or retaliate against them for expressing their views, thoughts, etc...
But freedom of speech is not absolute. There are some limitations. For example, freedom of speech does not cover libel, slander, harassment, threats, obscenity, pornography, etc... There can also be limits placed on where, when, and how people may express themselves. Such as needing permits to hold a demonstration, and being able to use noise amplification like loudspeakers. Or in this case, judges put out gag orders or protective orders on participants in a case.
It's extremely concerning the misconceptions people have concerning free speech. Especially here. Somewhere along the line, people got the idea that free speech means we can say whatever we want, whenever and wherever we want. And that's simply not true.
NO.
Like, I said. They are free to not sign it. If they want to be involved with him, they can make the decision to sign. Trump didn't choose to be involved with Jack. Just like corporate restaurants, if you work for KFC, you chose to work there but you are not free to disclose the 11 herbs and spices because you sign paperwork that says you can not share proprietary information.
When I retired from the military I had to sign one that said I would never divulge any information that I had gained by working on a top secret job. They’re pretty common in the military sector. I had no problem signing it because I knew by discussing my job would allow certain projects to be compromised
One day troll says what?
NDA is your choice to sign on or not.
Those pesky facts just keep getting in the way.
No. That is a contract. Trump doesn't "make" anyone sign it. It comes as a condition for employment, as it does in many industries.