We can replace your bullshit with a fact check, since you will deny the Organic Act of 1871 has any meaning whatsoever other than what this fact check says.
You're 100% wrong, unless you're claiming the year 1871 came before 1818.
Oh wait, they subsequently renegotiated the 49th parallel because the United States was now a corporation and they forgot to add that part in the 43 articles.
The Organic Act of 1871 establishes the municipality of Washington DC as "part of the territory of the United States." It has no other meaning, and you haven't shown any.
So they reaffirmed the border. So what? They did award the San Juan islands to the U.S., which didn't happen in 1818, Since I happen to live here, it has meaning for me.
The 43 articles of the Washington Treaty of 1871 had nothing to do with the U.S. as a corporation (in the business sense of the word) and did not itself deal with resolution of border questions.
I can feel your huffing and puffing from here. Drink some cold water or something. You don't have a speck of evidence to support your brain fever. I almost expect you to claim the negotiators were reptillians.
I just posted the fact check. Don't need to read you repeating it.
Also, you were 100% wrong. The Convention of 1818 established the 49th parallel, which begs the question of why that needed to be reestablished after 1871.
Great to know you rely on the fact check---which dismisses any silly notion that the U.S. was other than what it is, a republic. (Think of a Venn diagram with a balloon labeled "corporation". Think of other balloons within that balloon, labeled "republic", "city", "business enterprise." A republic is not a business enterprise, just like an elephant is not an alligator.)
Actually you were wrong on the 49th parallel. The Convention of 1818 provided for the 49th parallel as a boundary, yes, but also for joint administration of the area called Oregon territory by the U.S. and the Columbia Department of Canada by the British, for a period of 10 years. There was a falling out between the U.S. and Great Britain which made joint administration untenable. This was resolved by the treaty of Oregon in 1846, which separated the claims consistent with the 49th parallel boundary. But the question of who had the San Juan islands was still open, to be resolved the the process of the 1871 treaty (not by the treaty itself). The existence of Point Roberts is a testament to the scrupulous adherence to the final terms of the border resolution. The world of international politics is seldom tidy, especially when it comes to borders.
If you would actually do some research instead of confirmation bias, you might have more understanding. Your uninformed and knee-jerk reaction discredits your argument.
We can replace your bullshit with a fact check, since you will deny the Organic Act of 1871 has any meaning whatsoever other than what this fact check says.
https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/2021/01/fact-check-act-of-1871-did-not-establish-the-united-states-as-a-corporation.html
u/#wrong
You're 100% wrong, unless you're claiming the year 1871 came before 1818.
Oh wait, they subsequently renegotiated the 49th parallel because the United States was now a corporation and they forgot to add that part in the 43 articles.
https://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/convention-of-1818
The Organic Act of 1871 establishes the municipality of Washington DC as "part of the territory of the United States." It has no other meaning, and you haven't shown any.
So they reaffirmed the border. So what? They did award the San Juan islands to the U.S., which didn't happen in 1818, Since I happen to live here, it has meaning for me.
The 43 articles of the Washington Treaty of 1871 had nothing to do with the U.S. as a corporation (in the business sense of the word) and did not itself deal with resolution of border questions.
I can feel your huffing and puffing from here. Drink some cold water or something. You don't have a speck of evidence to support your brain fever. I almost expect you to claim the negotiators were reptillians.
I just posted the fact check. Don't need to read you repeating it.
Also, you were 100% wrong. The Convention of 1818 established the 49th parallel, which begs the question of why that needed to be reestablished after 1871.
Great to know you rely on the fact check---which dismisses any silly notion that the U.S. was other than what it is, a republic. (Think of a Venn diagram with a balloon labeled "corporation". Think of other balloons within that balloon, labeled "republic", "city", "business enterprise." A republic is not a business enterprise, just like an elephant is not an alligator.)
Actually you were wrong on the 49th parallel. The Convention of 1818 provided for the 49th parallel as a boundary, yes, but also for joint administration of the area called Oregon territory by the U.S. and the Columbia Department of Canada by the British, for a period of 10 years. There was a falling out between the U.S. and Great Britain which made joint administration untenable. This was resolved by the treaty of Oregon in 1846, which separated the claims consistent with the 49th parallel boundary. But the question of who had the San Juan islands was still open, to be resolved the the process of the 1871 treaty (not by the treaty itself). The existence of Point Roberts is a testament to the scrupulous adherence to the final terms of the border resolution. The world of international politics is seldom tidy, especially when it comes to borders.
If you would actually do some research instead of confirmation bias, you might have more understanding. Your uninformed and knee-jerk reaction discredits your argument.
I'm not relying on the fact check.
I'm saying I'm not interested on hearing you repeat the fake news narrative I'm already aware of.
And, yes, quit trying to rewrite history. You were wrong about the 49th parallel and now you're regurgitating the article I already posted.
Sorry, the original author was much better, that I can tell you.