So the basic idea is this. In 1870 and 1871, congress created a corporation to administer DC, and outsourced the functions of government to it, essentially copying the constitution as a set of corporate bylaws overlaid over the original constitution. Gradually the government functions were transferred from the original authority of the states and to the outsourced corporation which had been established in England to operate in DC, and this process was accelerated with the creation of the federal reserve.
Here are the two best summaries I have read to describe how it occurred. Both have links to actual congressional records, placed in context with explanations. It's reading that requires attention, but we'll worth it if you want to dig.
First is teamlaw: http://teamlaw.net/Mythology-CorpUS.htm#dcoa1871
Second is Anna Von Reitz: https://mainerepublicemailreport.com/2021/01/16/misinformation-about-the-act-of-1871-is-an-ongoing-problem-part-2/
I personally think Trump is reconstituting the Old Republic even while he simultaneously devolved the Corp. as described by the first few entries in Patel Patriot's devolution series (https://www.devolution.link/), and that the upcoming financial crash will end up with any of the Corp's assets (like the military contracts and gear, national parks, territories, and of course DC itself) being transferred back to the Old Republic. I don't actually know that's what he's doing, but devolution is extremely well documented, and it seems to dovetail well with the impending bankruptcy of the federal reserve. And there were a number of interesting meetings between Trump and state legislators (no other president that I know of has reached out to state assembly members that I can remember) that I heard about in the news between Nov 2020 and Jan 2021.
Anyway, after a comment in a different post, I thought it was worth posting some of the more readable links regarding the whole "what's up with the 1871 Corp?" topic.
If anybody has real info on those meetings with state assemblies, and I don't mean the Rudy Giuliani & Jenna Ellis presentations but rather the Trump - state legislator direct meetings that I only heard about, I'd be interested. I'll be offline for a bit but will check the thread later. Cheers.
To sink to your level, what you are saying is bullshit. I accept Q for what he purports to be, a person on the inside with news about events behind the scenes. He is not party to fancies. He does not believe the Earth is flat. He does not believe the Apollo program is a hoax. And he does not believe that JFK or Evis are alive. I've never seen that stupid "blueprint," and I have no need of it.
All this has come out from your miserable performance in trying to discuss the notion that the United States is some kind of covert private corporation---absolutely not sustained by anything put forward. You don't even have a good grasp of the history of the 49th parallel. Am I showing you the nakedness of your attire? Could be, but you have too much of your ego wrapped up in it. Some self-reflection could do you good.
Technique #3 say what?
Nobody said a damn thing about JFK, Elvis, flat earth, or a fake moon landing. Keep shilling.
You don't have to take them up. They were just illustrations of how Q does not advocate any number of paranoid conspiracy theories. You could have passed them by, but no, you had to make a thing out of it. You illustrate topic dilution.
Then why do you sustain interaction? It takes two to tango. Don't complain to me about your choices.