I like you. That being said, I feel like Trump ReTruthing her previous statements IS in fact an endorsement of that specific message in the context of that conversation. Not going to pretend everything she has said in the past or that she will say in the future is correct, but it is noteworthy that he retruthed Halperβs claim.
There are plenty of other surrogates pointing out "election integrity issues" that PDJT COULD have retruthed that also DID NOT mention Vatican Gold and US Corp. If those two things she talked about are NOT true, PDJT would know and would distance himself from them - I mean, why highlight them {via retruthing) if it's just gunna make him look like a conspiracy theory nutcase?
I like you. That being said, I feel like Trump ReTruthing her previous statements IS in fact an endorsement of that specific message in the context of that conversation. Not going to pretend everything she has said in the past or that she will say in the future is correct, but it is noteworthy that he retruthed Halperβs claim.
There are plenty of other surrogates pointing out "election integrity issues" that PDJT COULD have retruthed that also DID NOT mention Vatican Gold and US Corp. If those two things she talked about are NOT true, PDJT would know and would distance himself from them - I mean, why highlight them {via retruthing) if it's just gunna make him look like a conspiracy theory nutcase?
THIS! π
Gold right here
I concur. A Trump retruth IS an explicit fucking endorsement !