Not necessarily but when PDJT retruthed her, that became huge credibility. She may have been sent out to drop some seeds that will sprout later on. Some may not be ready to accept her message. There may be some dis/mis information too.
I like you. That being said, I feel like Trump ReTruthing her previous statements IS in fact an endorsement of that specific message in the context of that conversation. Not going to pretend everything she has said in the past or that she will say in the future is correct, but it is noteworthy that he retruthed Halper’s claim.
There are plenty of other surrogates pointing out "election integrity issues" that PDJT COULD have retruthed that also DID NOT mention Vatican Gold and US Corp. If those two things she talked about are NOT true, PDJT would know and would distance himself from them - I mean, why highlight them {via retruthing) if it's just gunna make him look like a conspiracy theory nutcase?
Not necessarily but when PDJT retruthed her, that became huge credibility. She may have been sent out to drop some seeds that will sprout later on. Some may not be ready to accept her message. There may be some dis/mis information too.
I like you. That being said, I feel like Trump ReTruthing her previous statements IS in fact an endorsement of that specific message in the context of that conversation. Not going to pretend everything she has said in the past or that she will say in the future is correct, but it is noteworthy that he retruthed Halper’s claim.
There are plenty of other surrogates pointing out "election integrity issues" that PDJT COULD have retruthed that also DID NOT mention Vatican Gold and US Corp. If those two things she talked about are NOT true, PDJT would know and would distance himself from them - I mean, why highlight them {via retruthing) if it's just gunna make him look like a conspiracy theory nutcase?
I concur. A Trump retruth IS an explicit fucking endorsement !