These stories came out of nowhere, so I'd be skeptical.
*They remind me of those rumors that they found Katie Hobbs cartel connections, and Hobbs was about to be arrested.
**That story came and went, and I'm sure a lot of people got very disappointed
This question requires qualification. Directly, Trump's comments specifically addressed election fraud, and not the numerous other assertions or points Halper made.
We might ask WHY DJT highlighted this interview, and also WHAT specifically about the interview he was intending to highlight.
In any case, equalting his retruthing the interview with an endorsement of everything she said, that seems like a leap of logic. There are a lot of variables we don't know here.
imho, I believe Trump and the overall plan have been too deliberate for Trump to endorse only a piece of an interview while not condoning the other parts. and even as "wacky" as what Jan said seemed to most normies and even many on GAW that aren't sure what to believe, the MSM and other enemies of this freedom movement haven't said boo about it. what does that tell you?
That's a good point. Let's see what develops.
That DJT highlighted the interview (and the person, for that matter) is obvious. His reasons for doing so are less obvious I think. There are many possibilities, but equating the retruthing with blanket endorsement seems a bit presumptuous to me.