Yeah so no actual sources, or documents showing the messages. Oh a link to a sister article. I call BS. Typical CNN reporting.
... and then the rest of the article reads like a legal team wanted to oversee the machines, with permission, which they got. Go ahead and call for discovery on this one. Please.
Just saying that auditing voting machines should be a right for all citizens - who audits the machines otherwise? The company itself? Sounds like a conflict of interest that way. A legal team from any stripe of political spectrum, should be allowed to access the machines and see what's gwan. If they do it with a paper trail, all the better.
Yeah so no actual sources, or documents showing the messages. Oh a link to a sister article. I call BS. Typical CNN reporting.
... and then the rest of the article reads like a legal team wanted to oversee the machines, with permission, which they got. Go ahead and call for discovery on this one. Please.
Just saying that auditing voting machines should be a right for all citizens - who audits the machines otherwise? The company itself? Sounds like a conflict of interest that way. A legal team from any stripe of political spectrum, should be allowed to access the machines and see what's gwan. If they do it with a paper trail, all the better.
We'll know this week if this is BS. The grand jury is meeting Tuesday.
Even then, we'll not know until trial because indictments don't include both sides of the story.
The article is about what indictments she will bring.....so we will know soon.