WHY is this stickied? Guys, if you would like to discuss the Maui "circular fire caused by teh space laserses" controversy, please use this (now) mega-thread:
IMHO, when a newbie stops by this site, there's plenty of great theories and some silly stuff too. That's almost every thread. I'd be more turned off by the "leaders of the site" going on a power trip and trying to make everybody think the same way than one individual's crazy tinfoil hat idea. It makes "us" look childish and impotent, again, IMHO. Ban me if you think it helps the site.
Who knew chemtrails and dews, both openly admitted by the government, would be the line we couldn't cross.
Limited hangout fuckery if you ask me.
Disgusting power trip. Is this how we win free speech? I'm always going to fight against people who tell me what it's ok to think or believe.
I don't think Hawaii was dews, but the Cali fires sure were. It's a fair game topic.
Why would I ban you for saying that? I think you're 100% right. Again, the posts being removed yesterday were the dumbest of the dumb ones. Search "Maui" on the site... you'll note we allowed lots and lots of posts. People want to react this way, fine, it's no big, we mods know what we signed up for.
Anyone who looks at pics from Maui and Cali fires knows they do not look like other fires. Nothing but slabs, glass melting, stands of trees untouched.
The trees are clearly burned. Fires can move quickly through an area, especially when driven by wind. In some situations, the flames might only consume the underbrush and low vegetation, leaving the taller trees unburned.
I live in the Canadian Rockies. We get fires... the fires burn wherever the wind goes. If the fire is approaching, say, a house, and the wind changes and blows the fire back on what it already burned, it won't have fuel to go anywhere, and it'll peter out. Yes, it looks weird. But HOW this is evidence of DEWs, I have no idea.
Not all wildfires burn at the same intensity. Some might only scorch the surface vegetation, while others can produce enough heat to ignite even the wettest and largest trees. Trees may remain unburned if the fire wasn't hot enough to ignite them. If a fire happens and gets out of control on a calm, low-wind day, it can get incredibly hot, leading to "candling," meaning that trees will literally explode from the water inside them boiling.
Tropical trees have more water in them, making them more resistant to being fully consumed. Some tree species have developed adaptations to survive fires. For instance, the bark on certain trees can be especially thick and insulative, protecting the tree's vital inner tissues from the heat.
But you don't want facts. You want to believe in space lasers.
No. Not saying it’s the same thing. But obviously what’s being tested Vs possible are different. I just wanted to add this info to the conversation. I’m not drawing conclusions because i follow the 48 hour rule of not jumping to conclusions.
WHY is this stickied? Guys, if you would like to discuss the Maui "circular fire caused by teh space laserses" controversy, please use this (now) mega-thread:
https://greatawakening.win/p/16c28il9wy/since-dews-seem-to-be-the-contro/
WHY did the boats burn? Ummmmm kinda maybe because they were in a marina, close to shore, next to flammable buildings? CALM DOWN, FROGS. BREATHE.
Further GAW posts will be removed. Thanks for understanding. Love, your mods.
IMHO, when a newbie stops by this site, there's plenty of great theories and some silly stuff too. That's almost every thread. I'd be more turned off by the "leaders of the site" going on a power trip and trying to make everybody think the same way than one individual's crazy tinfoil hat idea. It makes "us" look childish and impotent, again, IMHO. Ban me if you think it helps the site.
Bingo. Well stated.
Who knew chemtrails and dews, both openly admitted by the government, would be the line we couldn't cross.
Limited hangout fuckery if you ask me. Disgusting power trip. Is this how we win free speech? I'm always going to fight against people who tell me what it's ok to think or believe.
I don't think Hawaii was dews, but the Cali fires sure were. It's a fair game topic.
Why would I ban you for saying that? I think you're 100% right. Again, the posts being removed yesterday were the dumbest of the dumb ones. Search "Maui" on the site... you'll note we allowed lots and lots of posts. People want to react this way, fine, it's no big, we mods know what we signed up for.
Anyone who looks at pics from Maui and Cali fires knows they do not look like other fires. Nothing but slabs, glass melting, stands of trees untouched.
Welcome to how construction goes on
The trees are clearly burned. Fires can move quickly through an area, especially when driven by wind. In some situations, the flames might only consume the underbrush and low vegetation, leaving the taller trees unburned.
I live in the Canadian Rockies. We get fires... the fires burn wherever the wind goes. If the fire is approaching, say, a house, and the wind changes and blows the fire back on what it already burned, it won't have fuel to go anywhere, and it'll peter out. Yes, it looks weird. But HOW this is evidence of DEWs, I have no idea.
Not all wildfires burn at the same intensity. Some might only scorch the surface vegetation, while others can produce enough heat to ignite even the wettest and largest trees. Trees may remain unburned if the fire wasn't hot enough to ignite them. If a fire happens and gets out of control on a calm, low-wind day, it can get incredibly hot, leading to "candling," meaning that trees will literally explode from the water inside them boiling.
Tropical trees have more water in them, making them more resistant to being fully consumed. Some tree species have developed adaptations to survive fires. For instance, the bark on certain trees can be especially thick and insulative, protecting the tree's vital inner tissues from the heat.
But you don't want facts. You want to believe in space lasers.
I did post a news story about China testing some laser beams a few months back. I think that’s a fair play video.
Seriously? "China testing teh laser beams" to you = "SPACE LASERS" ???
No. Not saying it’s the same thing. But obviously what’s being tested Vs possible are different. I just wanted to add this info to the conversation. I’m not drawing conclusions because i follow the 48 hour rule of not jumping to conclusions.
Came back just to read the title of the post. Kek boatses