Most likely they do get specifics, imo. Probably can’t legally indict a John Doe. There have been some leaks about certain people providing testimony, but MSM immediately debunks as conspiracy theory.
MSM is effectively enforcing complete news blackout either for self-protection or through coercion by military.
They absolutely have to get the names and specifics of the crime. Juries are regular folks.
I served on a jury once.....just a civil trial, but it was definitely just regular folks.
In these Mafia cases described in the Netflix documentaries, they heard the real voices of the mobsters captured on wiretaps. The FBI would have to present evidence of how they wiretapped and when and how they proved it was their voice.
Do the regular people who serve on these grand juries get names and specifics?
For example do they get told "Here is Sally Snafu in a video handing over a bag of cash. You decide if we can indict."
If Sally Snafu is a famous person then true I would expect the jury members to gossip about it afterwards and it would be hard to keep secret.
But maybe they only get told "Person X" and other specifics are blurred out.
Or maybe the juries are indeed composed of trusted folk.
Most likely they do get specifics, imo. Probably can’t legally indict a John Doe. There have been some leaks about certain people providing testimony, but MSM immediately debunks as conspiracy theory.
MSM is effectively enforcing complete news blackout either for self-protection or through coercion by military.
They absolutely have to get the names and specifics of the crime. Juries are regular folks.
I served on a jury once.....just a civil trial, but it was definitely just regular folks.
In these Mafia cases described in the Netflix documentaries, they heard the real voices of the mobsters captured on wiretaps. The FBI would have to present evidence of how they wiretapped and when and how they proved it was their voice.
Anything else would be Unconsitutional.