I came across a story where a C130 reportedly saw a cruise missile. But that story disappeared fast. And that lines up with Gen . Stubllestine's interview which I just posted.
The c130 story was disinfo, imho. A shitload of building materials were staged right in front of the alleged impact zone of flight 77. Somehow, it missed all it, but plunged into the first floor. Yeah, right. The construction materials were actually incendiary and explosive. The plane that was seen by 30+ witnesses, FLEW OVER the Pentagon and the rigged explosives were detonated as it passed over.
Thank you. We are all here digging for the truth. The lack of landing gears , tires and tail section made this highly suspect from the photos we had seen. The small fin made me suspect cruise missile as the parking lot at the pentagon makes it difficult to maneuver in position even for experienced pilots. There is a possibility a cruise missile could appear to be a small plane to some witnesses. The fins would provide us the real answer. If they have it on the photo then they should have it as evidence.
sure... but I find it impossible to believe a large jetliner and a cruise missile could pass over and strike the Pentagon, simultaneously. I do reserve the possibility that a bunker buster was fired from close range, but the obvious signs of explosive charges in front would not have been necessary.
A plane and a missile, synchronized? It does not add up.
I came across a story where a C130 reportedly saw a cruise missile. But that story disappeared fast. And that lines up with Gen . Stubllestine's interview which I just posted.
Thank you for sharing the link
of course... I appreciate you and your work.
The c130 story was disinfo, imho. A shitload of building materials were staged right in front of the alleged impact zone of flight 77. Somehow, it missed all it, but plunged into the first floor. Yeah, right. The construction materials were actually incendiary and explosive. The plane that was seen by 30+ witnesses, FLEW OVER the Pentagon and the rigged explosives were detonated as it passed over.
Thank you. We are all here digging for the truth. The lack of landing gears , tires and tail section made this highly suspect from the photos we had seen. The small fin made me suspect cruise missile as the parking lot at the pentagon makes it difficult to maneuver in position even for experienced pilots. There is a possibility a cruise missile could appear to be a small plane to some witnesses. The fins would provide us the real answer. If they have it on the photo then they should have it as evidence.
sure... but I find it impossible to believe a large jetliner and a cruise missile could pass over and strike the Pentagon, simultaneously. I do reserve the possibility that a bunker buster was fired from close range, but the obvious signs of explosive charges in front would not have been necessary.
A plane and a missile, synchronized? It does not add up.